Posted by Lou Pilder on November 5, 2004, at 13:18:48
In reply to Re: Lou offers some clarification » Lou Pilder, posted by NikkiT2 on November 5, 2004, at 9:27:00
NikkiT2,
You wrote about your hurting from my requests to Dr. Hsiung to make a determination about some of your recent posts, some of which were directed to me by you.
Well, your posts directed by you to me have had a dramatic impact on me. And if we can discuss your hurting to make it a happier place, could we not also discuss my hurting? Your post about,[...don't tell me, I was being antisemitic by being upset with my husband because my husband has a jewish great aunt...]is causing me great distress. I feel that since I have not had a clear reply from Dr. Hsiung about the acceptability or not here for that statement by you, that it could mean that there is the potential for others to think that he endorses the statement to be allowed to be posted as being acceptable. You see, Dr. Hsing's reply to me recently was that he told you to be civil because you wrote to me after I used the feature to you not ot post to me. When I asked him to clarify that, he wrote that he may choose one post in a group of posts. But that does not , to me, tell me if he is saying that your other post in the group of posts are acceptable or not. You have written that it is your impression that since no PBC was given to you that thearfor the post(s)is/are acceptable. I asked a language expert on this and my answer that I received was that it could mean that the post that I requested for a determination is also {not} acceptable. So we have you thinking that no PBC means acceptability and another thinking that it is not acceptable eventhough t DR. Hsing wrote that some other post was not acceptable. That is why I am requesting that Dr. Hsiung now settle this unsettled question.
But could you consider my feelings about how I feel when I read that post of yours that you directed to me?
To me, this post by you about the jewish great aunt , by being a jew that had his relatives exterminated by the Nazis, reminds me of the horrors of Nazism. The jewish great aunt part in particular, because the nazis made it a crime punishable by death to be a jew. And to be a jew could mean that a relative of yours was a jew even if you were not a practicing jew. The nazis considered a jew to be a race, not a relgion and it was the race of jews that they wanted to exterminate. The nazis considered themelves to be the {master race}. One and one-half jewish children were murdered by the nazis because they had genetic jewishness. Their mother's sister or grandmother's sister that was jewish could have been jewish. They were childrem of jewish decent. The nazis considered it a crime to be of jewish decent punishable by death. This statement by you has caused me to see psychiatric help for I do not know how I can deal with it by being allowed to be posted on a mental health forum without me knowing if the moderator, DR. Hsiung, endorses it or not.
Your statement that you would say that you believe that I am evil but you won't, is causing me much distress also. I am not evil. And I also want a happier place where posters do not direct these type of statements, if they are considered by the forun to be not acceptable, to another poster with the thought that they think because the moderator, Dr. Hsiung, since he has not responded dirsctly and spacifacally to my request to determine the acceptability of those posts by you in question mean to you ,at least, since you belivethat they are acceptable because no PCB was given to them, that they are acceptable here in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:412031
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/412190.html