Posted by kid_A on March 8, 2002, at 10:27:50
In reply to Re: How social is Psycho Babble Social?, posted by Mitchell on March 8, 2002, at 8:39:57
>I found no need to know the authors identity - the message spoke for itself. I did not understand why anyone would pressure or call cowardly an author who chose to protect their identity during a dangerous period. IMO, this is can be grouped along with negative reactions to religious posts. Let it be.
Mitchell,
I don't quite get it. How much more anonymous can you be. Who is sar? Who is kid_A? who is Mair? Who is Mitchell? We all post under various amounts of anonymity, some people just put their full name, some people, like myself use pseudonyms to identify themselves.Something is wrong if someone feels the need to post under a different name, especially if it concerns something medical. Of all the places where a judgement would not be levied it is on a board such as this...
And tell me, what is wrong with a negative reaction to pushy religious pressuring?
poster:kid_A
thread:3268
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020308/msgs/3327.html