Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: I agree with Sad Sara.

Posted by Sad Sara on November 5, 2004, at 16:13:00

In reply to Re: I agree with Sad Sara. » Sad Sara, posted by crushedout on November 5, 2004, at 15:39:25

> the rule doesn't say you have to *intend* to accuse or put someone down -- i think it says something like "could lead" others to *feel* put down. it's actually a rather subjective standard.
>
> saying "i think you are missing my point" would make me feel insulted, that i was stupid or not careful or whatever. i'm not dr. bob and dr. bob did not pbc the guy for this, but i personally would be offended by the post if i were mandinka. whether or not he deserves a pbc as a technical matter is purely a question for dr. bob. if i were running the site, i obviously would have given him one.
>
> but you shouldn't structure what you do based on my opinions, unless your concern is being offensive to *me*. if that is your concern, i suggest not telling me i'm missing your point. i think there are much more diplomatic ways to get that same idea across. (e.g., "maybe i didn't make clear in my last post, but my point is...." some people may think this sounds like b.s., but phrasing stuff like that can make a big difference to recipients of messages. i'm actually not the most diplomatic person on these boards so i bet other people could explain this a lot better. :)
>
>

I don't think you talk BS, but for me your suggestion ("maybe i didn't make clear in my last post, but my point is...." ) and what the guy (I think you are missing my point) wrote has exactly the same meaning, maybe charlie thinks the same? I understand that intention is not viewed as really important, but I can't help thinking it is very important... if we get hurt even when people don't have the tinyest bit of intention in hurting, sarcasm, or otherwise offensiveness, but just has a bad way of phrasing him or herself... wouldn't we then either spend a lot of time in explaining the same over and over again, OR excluding a lot of people that COULD be a potential valuable contribution?

The reason I still have problems understanding why those two comments don't really wary in meaning is that I can't see "I think you are missing my point" as an attack on that person, no mor ethan I can see that medinkas misinterpretation of what that guy meant is an attack on that person....


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Sad Sara thread:411881
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041027/msgs/412298.html