Re: One sided ...

Posted by Dr. Bob on February 2, 2001, at 23:33:03

In reply to Re: One sided ..., posted by willow on February 2, 2001, at 22:30:39

> > > Is Name being judged by a previous faux pas?
> >
> > Partly so, yes. IMO, it's charitable for it only to be partly.
>
> I don't understand this. What does IMO stand for? Perhaps this will help clarify it for me.
In My Opinion, see also:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010122/msgs/52652.html
What I meant was, it wasn't *only* a previous "faux pas" that was being taken into account.
> > Why would it be counterproductive to everyone's growth?
>
> Learning acceptance is a good trait to have.
I agree, but complete total unconditional acceptance?
> I'm not so polyanna as to believe that there should be no conflict. Conflict can also lead to growth too!
I agree, it can, but it doesn't always.
Bob

Thread

Dr. Bob - The posts you were wondering about. shar 1/29/01
...
correction name 1/29/01
Re: please be civil » name Dr. Bob 1/30/01
Re: please be civil name 1/30/01
Your posts *yawn* » name NikkiT2 1/30/01
I don't think this is working, Name Rzip 1/30/01
Re: I don't think this is working, Name dennis 1/31/01
Re: I don't think this is working... dj 1/31/01
To dj, dennis and rzip ksvt 1/31/01
One sided ... willow 2/1/01
ksvt: Thank you for a positive response. :-) (np) Rzip 2/1/01
Re: One sided ... Dr. Bob 2/1/01
Re: One sided ... willow 2/2/01
Re: One sided ... Dr. Bob 2/2/01
Re: One sided ...Deja Vu Yankee Willow 7/6/02

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:403
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20001124/msgs/543.html