Posted by special_k on March 29, 2006, at 3:25:05
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » special_k, posted by gabbi~1 on March 28, 2006, at 23:54:26
> I'm surprised at the idea of sex without love being somehow.. wrong, or less worthy.
Sex that is not loving. It was more about that.
Objectification vs an act of kindness / lovingness.
> The idea of two people being together being the most acceptable form of "coupling" is more of an artificial invention than depictions of people having sex in various different ways.If it can be an activity between two subjects I don't see why it couldn't be an activity between three or four or whatever...
> I find it contradictory to dislike the idea of men "J*acking off" to a picture, and then ask a man if it's "okay" or if he would be "proud" if his daughter, or sister was doing it.If he would be "okay" or "proud" that other men were "j*cking off" to pictures of his daughter or sister etc.
Some women say they like to be treated as objects.
But then... Some women don't know any different...> Men will always "J*ck" off thinking about attractive women
I think thinking about is different from viewing pictures...
> Now You've said "You don't know what her goals are, her ideals, her personality"
> Well, neither do you, and you don't know whether or not she's completely satisfied with what she's doing.Sure. Would you pose for other people Gabbi? How about you other women who don't have a problem with porn? Why not?
> Making it about female/male sexuality, is just another form of repression.
The sex industry is about sex...
poster:special_k
thread:624556
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20060324/msgs/625930.html