Posted by Lou Pilder on March 25, 2014, at 11:56:04
In reply to Re: Lou's request-Thank you Dr. Bob-pheelbahd, posted by Willful on March 24, 2014, at 9:58:13
> Hi Lou,
>
>
> I think you may be mistaking what 10der is thanking Bob for. She is more likely thanking him for statements he made in conversations that she has expressed concern about, or on issues in which she has written herself. People tend to be more involved in topics where they are actively engaged.
>
> It is possible that 10der has noticed your conversation with Bob and has decided that she is no longer so concerned about, since he is taking it on himself to make judgments about the objections you raise.
>
> These issues are much more likely to be about why Bob changed some of his approaches to santioning posters, than about anything related to anti-semitism. All the former monitors are much more disturbed and involved with that issue than with others.
>
> I hope this somewhat addresses your concerns.W,
You wrote,[...she is more likely...it is possible...these issues are much more likely to be...than about anything related to anti-Semitism. All the former monitors are much more disturbed and involved with that issue than with others. I hope this somewhat addresses your concerns...].
I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean by what you wrote here. If you could post answers to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
True or false:
A. You know what 10_d_h I thanking Mr. Hsiung for.
B. You conclude that 10_d_h has never been actively engaged with me here.
C. You know for a fact that Mr. Hsiung is taking it on himself to make judgments about the objections that you, Lou, raise.
D. You know for a fact that Mr. Hsiung changed his approach to sanctioning posters and that is why the anti-Semitic statement, {No non-Christian can enter heaven} is allowed to stand.
E. You agree with Mr. Hsiung for the anti-Semitic statement to stand and go un repudiated by Hsiung that it will be good for this community as a whole for Mr. Hsiung to allow the anti-Semitic statement in question here to stand because his rationale that the author of the hate could feel too bad if the anti-Semitic statement was to have a repudiation posted to it that the posting of anything that could be disrespectful to another's faith is not supportive here, is much more important to this community than for Jews and Islamic people and all other people that have in their faith that they can enter heaven as not being a Christian to feel defamed.
F. You agree with Mr. Hsiung that his rationale for allowing the statement to be seen here as civil, could arouse anti-Semitic feelings in a subset of readers.
G. You agree with Mr. Hsiung that it is OK with him to allow the statement to stand because since one match could start forest fire, and being supportive takes precedence here, that the fire of hatred toward the Jews and the others that could come from the spark in the statement in question is supportive by you also.
Fill in:
P. If 10_d_h was a deputy of record when the statement was seen published, can she be an accessory to the fact that the antisemitic statement is unsanctioned and is not responsible for any injuries or deaths that could arise out of someone reading the post and seeing that it could be considered to be by a subset of readers what the owner and his deputies wants to promulgate here by the nature that since the antisenitic statement is un repudiated, it will be good for this community as a whole by the nature that if something is allowed to stand, it is not against the rules according to Mr. Hsiung?
If you think not, then coukd you post here your reason for that?
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1063157
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1063210.html