Posted by Lou Pilder on February 10, 2011, at 10:09:48
In reply to Re: exaggeration, posted by Dr. Bob on October 3, 2010, at 16:45:02
> > > > I am curious, if Linkadge had said that all antidepressants are great, would you call him out for exaggerating? Just curious.
> > >
> > > > Interesting point - that would also be an exaggeration.
> > >
> > > I agree with Ed.
> >
> > Bob, the question was not that it was an exaggeration, but would you have "called him out" for saying something positive. I think he makes a great point and asks a great question that will never be answered.
>
> How I'd respond would depend on the context. And also on whether anyone notifies us.
>
> Does that count as an answer?
>
> BobMr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...How I'd respond would depend...{on whether anyone notifies us}...]
Now I see that there could be a contingency here for you to respond. I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean by that. If you could post answers here to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond to what you post. When a member does notify the administration;
A. Does the admin agree that by the member satifying the contingency of sending a notification, that the admin thearfore does have a fudiciary duty to respond to the the notification because the admin has posted that a notification to the admin could be part of the aspect of being dependent for the admin to post a response?
B. Does the admin agree that the sending of a notification represents good faith by the sender, and members could
have the potential of an expectation of us posting a reply?
C. The posting here of that {it depends on whether anyone notifies us} could have the potential of members using the notification procedure to be emotionally distressed if the notification remains outstanding?
D. If the notification is outstanding, does the admin agree that members could have the potential to think that what you have posted here about {it depends on whether anyone notifies us} could cause the sender of an outstanding notification to consider that your statement in question has the potential to be considerd {misrepresentation} in regards to your TOS here if it is not responded to in a reasonable timely manner?
E. If the notification is outstanding, and the {context} could result in the death of someone because the notification is outstanding, do you agree that by leaving the notification outstanding that the members of the administration that participate in the notification procedure do represent a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a death could happen as a result of leaving the notification outstanding if there are reminders posted on the admin board?
F. Do you agree that the standard of {what a reasonable person would do},applies to the members of the administration here?
G. If you do not agree that the admin has a duty to respond to a notification, even though it is posted here that a notification is involved as that it is posted here {it depends on whether anyone notifies us}, what could be your rationale for such?.
H. Other responses
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:960354
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/979046.html