Posted by Lou PIlder on December 30, 2011, at 21:08:35
In reply to Lou's request-wrklezdzrhegrd? » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on February 10, 2011, at 10:09:48
> > > > > I am curious, if Linkadge had said that all antidepressants are great, would you call him out for exaggerating? Just curious.
> > > >
> > > > > Interesting point - that would also be an exaggeration.
> > > >
> > > > I agree with Ed.
> > >
> > > Bob, the question was not that it was an exaggeration, but would you have "called him out" for saying something positive. I think he makes a great point and asks a great question that will never be answered.
> >
> > How I'd respond would depend on the context. And also on whether anyone notifies us.
> >
> > Does that count as an answer?
> >
> > Bob
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> You wrote,[...How I'd respond would depend...{on whether anyone notifies us}...]
> Now I see that there could be a contingency here for you to respond. I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean by that. If you could post answers here to the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond to what you post. When a member does notify the administration;
> A. Does the admin agree that by the member satifying the contingency of sending a notification, that the admin thearfore does have a fudiciary duty to respond to the the notification because the admin has posted that a notification to the admin could be part of the aspect of being dependent for the admin to post a response?
> B. Does the admin agree that the sending of a notification represents good faith by the sender, and members could
> have the potential of an expectation of us posting a reply?
> C. The posting here of that {it depends on whether anyone notifies us} could have the potential of members using the notification procedure to be emotionally distressed if the notification remains outstanding?
> D. If the notification is outstanding, does the admin agree that members could have the potential to think that what you have posted here about {it depends on whether anyone notifies us} could cause the sender of an outstanding notification to consider that your statement in question has the potential to be considerd {misrepresentation} in regards to your TOS here if it is not responded to in a reasonable timely manner?
> E. If the notification is outstanding, and the {context} could result in the death of someone because the notification is outstanding, do you agree that by leaving the notification outstanding that the members of the administration that participate in the notification procedure do represent a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a death could happen as a result of leaving the notification outstanding if there are reminders posted on the admin board?
> F. Do you agree that the standard of {what a reasonable person would do},applies to the members of the administration here?
> G. If you do not agree that the admin has a duty to respond to a notification, even though it is posted here that a notification is involved as that it is posted here {it depends on whether anyone notifies us}, what could be your rationale for such?.
> H. Other responses
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung and his deputy,
In regards to your reminder provision, the above.
Day after day, night after night, my requests to you here remain outstanding. Yet today, there could be thousands of readers here being led by the fact tht they could think that statements that are not sanctioned by the adminstation are to be considerd to be supportive. People can be led to think that because you have posted your policy here that you do not wait to sanction a statement as unsupportive because that one match could start a forest fire and that support takes precedence and what is not supportive is not to be posted here. By the nature of statments remaining unsanctioned, an indoctrination could be going on here, an indoctrination that could IMHHHHO lead to the death of a member or someone that a member kills while in a drug-induced state that compels them to want to kill themselves and/or others. And you say that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole. And a reporter calls you a {mastermind}. Do you agree with him/her?
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:960354
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1005937.html