Re: are these examples sweeping?

Posted by Dr. Bob on June 28, 2010, at 2:06:18

In reply to Re: overgeneralizations are still uncivil » Dr. Bob, posted by glydin 2010 on June 26, 2010, at 18:27:38

> IF a poster were to post:
>
> "_______ (insert med, med class, treatment) is____________!"
>
> 1) crap
> 2) sh*t
> 3) worthless
> 4) damaging
> 5) not for any human
> 6) never works
>
> is that example sweeping?
Good question, what do others think?
Bob
"a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind" -- The New York Times

Thread

Are generalizations still uncivil? Glydin 2010 6/23/10
Re: Are generalizations still uncivil? ron1953 6/23/10
Re: Great question. (nm) » Glydin 2010 fayeroe 6/23/10
That will probably ALSO not get addressed ;) (nm) » fayeroe Glydin 2010 6/24/10
Re: overgeneralizations are still uncivil Dr. Bob 6/26/10
Re: overgeneralizations are still uncivil » Dr. Bob glydin 2010 6/26/10
Re: are these examples sweeping? Dr. Bob 6/28/10
Re: are these examples sweeping? PartlyCloudy 6/28/10
Being Linguistically Correct » PartlyCloudy violette 6/28/10
Being Linguistically Correct violette 6/28/10
Not addressed to anyone in particular Dinah 6/28/10
Re: are these examples sweeping? SLS 6/28/10
Re: are these examples sweeping? Glydin 2010 6/28/10
Re: are these examples sweeping? » Glydin 2010 Dinah 6/28/10
Re: are these examples sweeping? PartlyCloudy 6/28/10
LOL : ) (nm) » PartlyCloudy Glydin 2010 6/28/10
I think it IS a me issue Glydin 2010 6/29/10
Re: I think it IS a me issue » Glydin 2010 PartlyCloudy 6/29/10
Re: I think it IS a me issue » PartlyCloudy Glydin 2010 6/29/10
...
Re: overgeneralizations are still uncivil Dr. Bob 6/29/10

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:951974
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20100321/msgs/952473.html