Posted by Lou Pilder on December 26, 2009, at 10:29:00
In reply to Lou's reply-nhegawrd » 2nd xylophone, posted by Lou Pilder on December 26, 2009, at 10:18:24
> > > A. Are you wanting to use the word {behavior} in one way or the other or both or niether?
> >
> > Both
> >
> > > B. Are youu aware that the time that a post that could lead a Jew to feel put down/accused, or anyone else, is left to stand without posting in the thread where it is innitially posted that irt is uncivil, or that the post is deleted , has been ruled by some jurisdictions to be in direct proportion to the amount of harm done to the person that the statement is directed to?
> >
> > What are these some jurisdictions? Who's doing the ruling of proportions? How is that measured?
> >
> > > C. other questionss not stated
> >
> > Impossible to answer questions which aren't stated don't you think?
> >
> > I've answered your questions and I would appreciate answers to mine directed to you. Answers not questions.
> >
>
> 2X,
> You wrote,[...would appreciate answers...] and,[...what are these some jurisdictiuons?...].
> One jurisdiction that considers negligence as a tort is Israel. The owner was fined substantially for the negligence in the following link. There is also {criminal negligence} which I will show you later at your request.
> Lou
> http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?id=1789&s=latenews2X,
Now that the site is up, in the search box you could type in {Israel}. Then you could see the case where the internet manager was liable. The fine against the manager was substantial. You could then find the criminal negligenmce case and the award case also. Then you could type in other jurisdictions. You could even contact that law office yourself. Then you could have a better understanding IMHO of what I (redacted by resondent)
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:930901
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20091103/msgs/930949.html