Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Rules - What constitutes an infraction? » gardenergirl

Posted by Amelia_in_StPaul on June 22, 2009, at 2:16:40

In reply to Re: Rules - What constitutes an infraction? » Amelia_in_StPaul, posted by gardenergirl on June 22, 2009, at 1:18:53

If you replied with that statement only, just "Gosh you're so smart," that would be sarcasm. Who uses "gosh" any more without serious emoticon action?

Gosh, this is fun.

^ Sarcasm or not?


> > I got what you meant. My point, by example, is that words have connotative and denotative meaning. So #1 and #2 are not mutually exclusive, at all.
>
> And so if I were to reply with something like, "Gosh, you're so smart", how would you determine whether I am being sarcastic or sincere using just the words themselves?
>
> gg
>
>
> >
> > > My point is that you can't have #1 and #2. You can't have it both ways. If you indeed want to only consider the words themselves, then you cannot make assumptions or inferences about tone and/or intent.
> > >
> > > gg
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Amelia_in_StPaul thread:901329
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090529/msgs/902563.html