Posted by Lou Pilder on June 7, 2009, at 14:38:06
In reply to Re: Lou's request-ru?, posted by SLS on June 7, 2009, at 11:50:15
> > > > > Let's see how much upset we can cause each other.
> > > >
> > > > I do apologize that this last sentence was not clear as to who "each other" was. I had meant "each other" to mean anyone or everyone on Psych-Babble, not just Scott and Twinleaf. It was not meant to be directed at Twinleaf specifically. It really does sound that way, though.
> > >
> > > Thanks for apologizing to Twinleaf. How about if see how much we can support each other instead?
> > >
> > > > > Scott, did you intend ... for alex to feel accused? Could you rethink what you said?
> > > >
> > > > Upon further reflection, I would not change a single thing except for the way I chose to act on my thoughts and feelings.
> > >
> > > I don't mean to put words in your mouth, but are you saying you regret how you chose to act on your thoughts and feelings?
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > You wrote,[...are you saying...] to Scott.
> > You have posted that a member was to please be civil because the member posted "are you saying" to another member. You posted that the use of that phrase was uncivil because you posted that the phrase implies that the other member means what is the subject of what the other member asks as to if they are saying that. This is posted here on March 25, 2007.
> > Now I am unsure then why you have posted,[...are you saying...] here to Scott. Using your reasoning, then could it not be interpreted that you are implying that Scott means such as to what follows from the use of the phrase,[...are you saying...]?
> > Then reading the statement to Scott, one could think, according to your posting on March 27, 2007 about the use of [...are you saying...], that there is the potential IMO that there in an implication that Scott means what you posted.
> > Even if Scott did mean such, I am unsure as to why you posted such to him here. If you could elaborate with clarification concerning why you posted such to him here, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Dear Lou,
>
> For reasons I don't fully understand, you easily have a majority of people who endear themselves to you, even me, despite our conflicts. I must say, though, with sadness, that I have an extremely difficult time processing your posts because your writing style is so foreign to me, and for some reason, is inconsistent with the way my poor little brain works. I might be the only person in the world with this problem, but I will work on it.
>
> Perhaps the doctor was requesting a clarification of my statements as he might not have understood precisely what I had meant to say. I hope my responses achieved his goal.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...for reasons I don't understand...a difficult time...].
Here is a link to a post that I would like for you to read and the other posts in that thread. I think that the difficulty could be made less if we examine some threads concerning unresolved issues involving outstanding requests that if those were responded to in relation to the TOS here IMO I could have the opportunity to perhaps make the difficulty less.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070702/msgs/774900.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:895265
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090529/msgs/899841.html