Posted by Lou Pilder on November 9, 2008, at 15:19:57
In reply to *correction to link*-Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung, posted by Lou PIlder on May 31, 2008, at 14:06:11
> > > > > > Lou, does your idea (of the foundations of?) Judaism in some way preclude the idea that other faiths have validity and a place in the world?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is that the problem?
> > > > >
> > > > > I think that could in fact be a problem with posting the foundations of some faiths, or at least some ways of posting them, see:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7889.html
> > > > >
> > > > > Bob
> > > >
> > > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > > Your posted here that your rule states that if the foundation of a faith puts down those of another faith that it is not supportive.
> > > > I am unsure as to what the criteria are that you use in your thinking that could determine that a foundation of a faith is or is not one that could lead one of another faith to feel put down or not. If you could list those here, myself and other members could know in advance what those criteria are, (your rationale), so that they can post accordingly and perhaps post here concerning the actions taken by the administration and to the TOS concerning that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and your asking members to trust you about that and that you want to have feedback and be fair.
> > > > In any reply to me, could you consider that you have posted here that believing that what could lead someone to feel put down does not in your thinking, and in mine also, ligitimize here what the statement could purport.
> > > > Lou Pilder
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > If you are consideing being a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on this offered link and look through the aspects of the types of arguments presented and how they can be determined to be fallacious arguments or not.
> > > Lou
> > > http://www.changeminds.org/discilines/aregument/fallacies/a_appeal.htm
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In regards to your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> > Lou PIlder
> >
> > Friends,
> > If yu are considering being a discussant in this thread, if you could read what is in the offered link (citation nizkor) so that if what is in the link comes up, you could recognize it if you do not already know of these fallacies, I would appreciate it.
> > Lou
> > citation nizkor
> > http://www.nizkor.org/fatures/fallaciea/
> >
> Friends,
> The corrected link is;
> http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
> LouMr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above. In any reply to me here if you use the aspect of {shall}, could you consider that there is a post that uses {only} and it is allowed to stand?
Lou
Friends,
If yu would like to see the post in question, you could email me if you like.
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:816514
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081003/msgs/861827.html