Posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 16:54:00
In reply to Lou's reply to Zeba-tolldhastatut » Zeba, posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 6:05:11
> > I guess that if something was disturbing about a post or thread back in 2004, how come nothing was said then? This is what I do not understand.
> >
> > Personally, I would think that if something is not objected to, that after a year it is too old. Is there something written this year that you find offensive or object to??
> >
> > Zeba
>
> Zeba,
> You wrote,[...how come nothing was said then (in 2004)?...]
> I am unsure as to what infomation you are using to post the above. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> A. In,[...how come nothing was said (then)?...] what facts, if any, are you using to write [...how come nothing was said (then)...]?
> B. If there was something said (then), what in your opinion could be a reason, if any, for the statements in question to still be allowed to stand?
> LouZeba,
You wrote,[...I don't understand...?]
I think that one could have a better understanding of the issues here and in parallel threads here by examining a thread here. Here is a link to a post to the thread. If you could email me, I could point out the posts in question to save time if you like.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20080404/msgs/836274.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:846103
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/847250.html