Posted by Lou Pilder on August 19, 2008, at 6:05:11
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Zeba-ahdpop » Lou Pilder, posted by Zeba on August 19, 2008, at 0:51:25
> I guess that if something was disturbing about a post or thread back in 2004, how come nothing was said then? This is what I do not understand.
>
> Personally, I would think that if something is not objected to, that after a year it is too old. Is there something written this year that you find offensive or object to??
>
> ZebaZeba,
You wrote,[...how come nothing was said then (in 2004)?...]
I am unsure as to what infomation you are using to post the above. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. In,[...how come nothing was said (then)?...] what facts, if any, are you using to write [...how come nothing was said (then)...]?
B. If there was something said (then), what in your opinion could be a reason, if any, for the statements in question to still be allowed to stand?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:846103
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080719/msgs/847156.html