Posted by Lou Pilder on March 14, 2008, at 20:56:03
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to SLS-shdwvyrsml » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on March 14, 2008, at 19:20:19
> > > You very often answer a question by posing another question. It is very difficult to maintain a conversation under these circumstances. If you could answer the questions that I pose to you, I will be better able to respond.
>
>
> > Scott,
> > You wrote,[...verbalize your concerns...]
> > Could you take a look at the opening page of the faith forum and clik on the offered links? Then if you see something that you think is of discussion in regards to this topic, could you post it?
> > Lou
>
> Let's get going already! Don't be bashful, now.
>
> Scott - Q:
> Lou - A:
> Scott - Q:
> Lou - A:
>
> Please review our previous posts along this thread so that you will once again have an opportunity to respond to my questions.
>
> Lou, if you do not answer my questions, I doubt that I can participate in a discussion with you.
>
> You are the one having submitted complaints, not me. It is incumbent upon you to state concisely your opinions and supporting facts.
>
> Please try again. You have nothing to gain from asking of me any more questions.
>
> Don't let this discussion become irrelevant.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote,[...please try again...]
The aspect of what is involved here includes what has been used here in this forum as the concept of posting what {could lead one to feel accused or put down}. Another aspect is what Mr. Hsiung has posted in regards to if a member believes something.
There are generally accepted meanings to those concepts. Yet today, I am unsure as to if the generally accepted meanings are being held here to apply in some cases. These cases could be seen in this thread if I posted the links to posts that have been allowed to stand and posts that have been sanctioned, but the new rules that I have been referring to make me unsure as to if I could post the links to the posts even though some of the posts in question have been allowed to stand and/or have been authored by Mr. Hsiung or one of his deputies.
Also, there is a post from Mr. Hsiung here concerning what will happen to me here if I was to post the foundation of my faith in that it has been revealed to me supernaturally a commandment to me that I XXX (the foundation of Judaism) that I would like to post but that the new rules make me unsure as to if I could post it or not even thought the faith forum is for posting about the supernatural.
There are also posts that have historical paralles such as XXX and YYY that I am unsure as to if I could post those here for referrence in our discussion.
Without posting those links and also links to other's research that I am also unsure as to if I could post those links here, I am unsure as to how I could post answers to your questions in your posts here to me.
I do have a possible solution to contimue our discussion because that I think that the links to the posts in question can not be left out of the discussion. One suggestion is to either email me for the URLs of the posts in question or set up a yahoo account for me to email those to you or have a friend allow me to email to them and they email them to you.
I really would like to continue the discussion but I think that the posts in question need to be included in the discussion. I am sorry if you could not do one of the things to receive the links to those posts and look forward to having other discussions outside of this one if we can not share the URLs to the posts in question.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:816511
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080313/msgs/817993.html