Posted by zazenduckie on December 8, 2006, at 18:30:47
In reply to Are you saying my post was not civil? » zazenduckie, posted by gardenergirl on December 8, 2006, at 17:58:17
Did you see my post asking what you meant when you posted "There goes that hope...KABOOM nm" ? It was in another thread.
Since the only hope I recall speaking of was that ASV was not really dead, was that the hope you were referring to? I know you said my idea about looking for a death record made sense (or something like that) and to let you know what I found out. But I said I didn't want to do that. Are you saying that you yourself have some definitive proof that ASV is really dead? I was very puzzled by your post and you never answered my question.
> > > > My question is if you would consider what the deputy/member, gardenergirl, has written to me to do, as to constitute advocating that I commit deceit?
> > >
> > > Why do you ask?
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
............................................
I don't even know how to spell subourning perjury but by golly I think it would (IF Bob's answer was yes that you were advocating Lou commit deceit) be uncivil and I'd demand an impeachment hearing IF you (Bob) thought that was the case!That was what I meant.
..................................
>
> I'm kicking myself even as I type this, but I just have to ask... are you saying that you interpret this post http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/710831.html , particularly where I write "Yes, you can send it to Dr. Bob. Frankly, he has no way of knowing whether you sent it to anyone else beforehand or not" as advice from me to Lou regarding what he should do, and that said "advice" would be uncivil?
.................
No I didn't express any personal opinion of that at all.
...............
> >
> > Actually Lou has a long record of not trying to go around your rules and my guess would be that he doesn't want to commit deceit and is checking with you first before following her advice. Why didn't you answer the question?
>
> Exactly which "advice" are you referring to? There's also this "advice" http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/711276.html "Or a simple solution would be for Lou to just go ahead and send it to someone, get an opinion, and then send it to Dr. Bob for his "final answer"."
>
> Oh and by the way, feel free to demand an "impeachment hearing" whenever you like. Please be aware, however, that you'd be demanding something that does not exist in Babble procedures. So you might wish to consider demanding that "impeachment hearings" exist before demanding that one be held. Just a thought.
>
....................
GG dear are you supposed to be writing a thesis? I hate to depart from my purely admistrative speculations and suggestions ...but GOOD GRIEF are you actually spending time on advising me about Babble impeachment hearings?
poster:zazenduckie
thread:711220
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/711656.html