Posted by Lou Pilder on December 8, 2006, at 16:31:56
In reply to I don't know about Lou » Dr. Bob, posted by zazenduckie on December 8, 2006, at 15:44:30
Friends,
It is written here,[...Lou has a long record of trying not to go around your (Dr.Hsiung's) rules...checking with you before following her advice...Why didn't you answer the question...].
ZZDuk has brought up many issues before us now. And it is much more IMO than just this one issue here. For me to contribute in this thread could have me need to cite many posts of the past- practice.
ZZDuk writes what can be seen by her/him. I ask that if you are going to contribute to this discussion that you consider the following in your post as to what the deputy/member wrote;
A. the deputy/member writes,[...Yes you can send it to (Dr. Hsiung)..he has no way of knowing whether you sent it to anyone else beforehand or not...]
B.that she is using to base that statement on her confidence in her common sense
C. that she write that she is certain it is not a requirement for me to send it to someone else first before I send it to Dr. Hsiung
D.that she is certain that I would not have any administrative action toward me if I did
E and that I am to please consider her response to me as a response from a deputy to help me understand the rules.
This {response from a >deputy< makes a great difference than if her response was from her as a member. She later wrote something like that her response had to be as a deputy because I had issued a PDNP . If that is the case, then I think that this issue is moot and I have asked Dr. Hsiung to consider my request to allow me to withdraw the question in question, because as a member it is an opinion, that is diferent than from a deputy concerning board policy.
So I ask that you consider these statements in any post here that you would like to contribute.
Thanks,
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:711220
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/711619.html