Posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2006, at 7:50:19
In reply to Lou explains the exceptions to the 3 rule, posted by Lou Pilder on August 16, 2006, at 7:27:00
Friends,
There is also some aspect in the rule that could mean that the consecutive posts would have to be in the same day. I agree with that concept if it is in the spirit of the rule, for the goal of the rule seems to imply that.
I am not against any rule as long as it is well-defined and applied equally.
My concern here is that I would like to have dialog with Dr. Hsiung and his deputies about the aspect that I think that dialog is necessarry to clear up that it could be seen that the rule is not apllied equally , for there are on the board posters posting 4 consecutive posts and those posters are not being told that they are uncivil for doing so, yet I have requested to be allowed to post more than 3 consecutive posts and my requests have been denied.
Being that this is the administrative board to discuss the rules in general, then the rule itself,IMO, is not applicable on this board, for the administrative board is not for support and education, but to discuss the administration of the site.
I do not feel comfortable with this rule because I see,IMO, that it is not being applied equally, but as to the other rule, I can not post the URLs of the posts that are being allowed with 4 consecutive posts to show that here.
This leads me to feel discriminated upon, and I am asking for dialog with the adminstration to clear this up now so that there is a proper undestanding about a rule that is being developed, which goes to the part of a rule being "well-defined" and "applied equally."
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:677002
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/677003.html