Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: About venting

Posted by Dr. Bob on June 23, 2006, at 4:31:51

In reply to Re: About venting » gardenergirl, posted by Jakeman on June 22, 2006, at 21:11:18

> I think Larry Hoover is Babble Royalty (no sarcasm intended) and should *never* be blocked.

I think Larry would get lots of votes, but I'm the only one who can't be blocked.

> if there's true harassment ... administration should step in and take action. Leaving this to the posters encourages DNP *warfare* - dueling DNP's.
>
> verne

If each side issued a DNP, wouldn't that end any warfare?

--

> > PS: I'm trying out a new system:
> >
> > previous block: x weeks
> > period of time since previous block: x weeks
> > uncivil toward a particular individual or group: yes/no
> > particularly uncivil: yes/no
> > different type of incivility: /yesno
> > clearly didn't understand PBC and made effort to reply: yes/no
> > provoked: yes/no
> > uncivil in multiple posts at same time: yes/no
> > already archived: yes/no
>
> How does this formula work?
>
> It seems that you take the previous block and subtract the weeks since that block; then you apparently take that and multiply by 2 (or so, depending on whether you end up with a 0, in which case you add a number-- how is that number calculated?)

"New" means not completely worked out yet. But the general idea is:

new block = (old block - time off for civil behavior) * multiplier

time off = weeks since previous block / 10

multiplier
= 1 if provoked
= 3 if toward a particular individual or group, particularly uncivil, or in multiple posts
= 2 otherwise

And first blocks (or blocks when the number to be multiplied is < or = 0) are 1 week.

> I'm very very saddened by the unfolding of events in this last few days and weeks, as I read them. I don't know the people involved, but it is so very very sad.

I agree.

> I honestly don't know how these exchanges were evoked, but couldn't the people involved be put on moderation or something?

That's been discussed, see:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20051205/msgs/596986.html

> Or maybe some other intervention?
>
> Jost

I'm open to suggestions...

--

> > Or maybe it's saying, "There's lots you can vent about, but not necessarily about everything you may wish to."
>
> I'm a big advocate of clear communication. I think the good Doc should provide clarification- revisions.
>
> Jake

These deputies, they translate very well. :-) Is her restatement clear enough?

Bob


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:659757
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060622/msgs/660484.html