Posted by thuso on January 20, 2006, at 19:18:51
In reply to Do not posts » one woman cine, posted by Dinah on January 20, 2006, at 9:04:04
> I *think* that Dr. Bob has just said that it was ok for someone to post an apology that refers to the poster in third person. He can check it out when he comes to the board, because it's apparently a very complex rule to enforce.
>I don't see a problem with the first post because it was obviously to everyone. It is the second post where I think one woman cine was referred to. Look at how Susan47 replies to what she quotes from one woman cine....
> > . Since I can only explain what has happened to me, (& for obvious reasons, not in great detail) I would appreciate it if any legal observations be left as just that, interpretative; and not the authority.
> Exactly. Everything I say here is interpretative and I haven't claimed to be the authority on anything.
>By saying "exactly" and going on to agree with the statement, she is talking to one woman cine. Her statement is not to everyone. No where in her reply does she refer to anyone or everyone. If someone quoted me and then wrote something similar to what Susan47 did, then I would definitely interpret that post as directed at me.
We'll see what Dr. B says.
poster:thuso
thread:597024
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060111/msgs/601235.html