Posted by Susan47 on January 16, 2006, at 13:03:05
In reply to Re: A Question...., posted by Susan47 on January 16, 2006, at 13:01:17
> But unfortunately what we say has consequences, doesn't it, and it's up to those making accusations to prove that their interpretation is correct if they want to make a case out of something. So that's probably the way things work. You'd have to make a case, or someone else would, without physical evidence for a crime. With physical evidence, on the other hand, it's all pretty much a breeze. The law is usually open to interpretation. Gross interpretation, sometimes.
Gross interpretation to match gross circumstances, maybe? Are we having fun, yet?
Sorry if I've jumped in here, inappropriately. I just couldn't help myself, I had to pick this up.
poster:Susan47
thread:597024
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060111/msgs/599649.html