Posted by Lou Pilder on June 12, 2005, at 12:51:22
In reply to Dr. Bob. please read..accusations, posted by jay on June 12, 2005, at 12:20:46
> > Lou,
> >
> > I just want to acknowledge your support for those who are concerned with fairness and consistency in the administration of this electronic forum. The perception of unfairness, actual unfairness and inconsistent administration of human communities often has a detrimental effect on the mental health of some people. An interest in fair administration can be very supportive of people who are sensitive to unfairness or to the perception of unfairness.
> >
> > I also want to point out that some of the most effective voices for justice have at times been isolated and scorned by the majority of their community. Likewise, some of those who laid the foundations for modern science and modern medicine by their attention to consistency and accuracy that contravened prevailing community standards were often shunned even to the point of death, but their efforts continue to save and improve lives now centuries later. A troublesome rain today can nourish life for the future.
> >
>
> I feel deeply offended and put down that it is implied if I do not take the poster's (so) viewpoint, that I promote "unfairness" and any/all of my posts are "troublesome".
>
> Thanks,
> Jay
Friends,
I am requesting that before you contribute to this thread that writes about "so"'s writing, that you consider the following.
A. Is there a statement that implies that "so" writes that "jay" or anyone else, that if they do not take the viewpoint of "so", that they "promote unfairness"?
B. Does not "so"'s post write,[...Lou, I want to acknowlege your support for those {who are concerned with fairness and consistancy in the administration of this...forum} and, {an interest in fair administration can be very supportive of people that are sensitive to unfairness}...]?
C. and does not "so"'s statement in "B" imply that my posts are for support of {those that are concerned with fairness and consistancy...]?
D. Could there be members of this forum that are not concerned with fairness and consistantcy?
E. If there are, then is it not that my posts could have the potential to be {not for them}?
F. But did "so" ever say or imply that the members of this mental-health community that are not concerned about fairness and consistancy in the administration of the site, that those members "promote unfairness"? If so, could anyone post the URL and the statement that says that?
Lou
>
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:510909
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050530/msgs/511484.html