Posted by so on June 11, 2005, at 16:06:05
In reply to Administrative?, posted by Sarah T. on June 11, 2005, at 2:54:44
> What makes you think LP's interests are administrative?
I think they are administrative because they address administrative concerns.
>Do you think they are administrative because they appear on the Administration Board?
I think if they were posted to any other board in this forum they would be redirected to the administrative board. That tends to reinforce my opinion, based on the content of the posts, that they are administrative in nature because I have observed the administrator classifying such concerns as administrative.
Are you suggesting by posing the question that Lou's concerns might be something other than what he represents them to be?
If not, I don't understand the question, which seems to ask why I take his posts at face value.
But if so, can you expose what you you think his posts might be, other than administrative, without contravening the guidelines for writing to this forum?
Do you think that asking why a person takes another's writing at face value could lead the writer in question to believe someone has raised the possibility that they are only pretending their writen concerns are what they represent them to be?
And, if a person thought they had been encouraged to feel put down by a question about the face value of their concern, do you think that person would be allowed to say, in the same phraseology others have used on this page, "I was offended"? Or...
Do you think it is possible that one person can write "I was offended" and not be sanctioned, while others might write "I was offended" and would be called uncivil by the psychiatrist who administers this board?
poster:so
thread:510909
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050530/msgs/511103.html