Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Requesting clarification » gardenergirl

Posted by so on May 19, 2005, at 8:50:33

In reply to Requesting clarification » so, posted by gardenergirl on May 19, 2005, at 5:39:40

> > >
> > THEY SACRIFICED.
>
> Sounds to me like they merely had different values.

"Mere" is a subjective term. Many chose to forego privilage, wealth and comfort to actualize their values, only to become icons emmulated everywhere from the Hollywood comedies to corporate costume parties.


>
> And um, would you please answer my question involving whether this is your third screen name on Babble?

A. I answered the question in my second post under this name and ...
B. Please do not pressure me to comply with your requests.


>
> And to clarify another comment you made...this is personal research on your part?


I'm having a difficult time parsing this as something other than a rhetorical question. It seems plain I am talking about my personal experiences. I referred to educating myself -- not about conducting research for formal publication. Were I to conclude personal findings that informed a publishable study, the first step of publication would be a literature review to report what is already known about the high error rate among healthcare professionals. It is extremely unlikely I would publish any original scientific research on the topic.


>I suppose including Dr. Bob in your sample is cheaper than visiting "senior healthcare providers" in person to assess their communication skills.

It might be one of the less costly sources of information. Perhaps I seek information here after having exhausted resources elsewhere.

> and Emmy already pointed out the role conflict with viewing a webmaster as holding the same role as a practicing psychiatrist. How are you planning to parse out what role is responsible for which message in the communication?

If phsycians were found to be particularly prone to bluffing at card games because of the implicit trust others place in them, would that not be informative about how they tend to use the trust they earn?


> I suppose like we all have our own set of values, we also have our own risk tolerance and ability to judge another individual's trust-worthiness.

So my effort to learn what fits in my personal standards is worthwhile.

> Good luck with your study! (emoticon would normally go here)
>


I don't understand emoticons -- at least not in terms others always confirm. I tend to read them as (which is to say "To me they sometimes seem to mean") "just kidding".


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:so thread:499301
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050517/msgs/499807.html