Posted by krazy kat on May 26, 2002, at 12:22:07
In reply to Re: Response to Concerns..., posted by Dr. Bob on May 24, 2002, at 19:16:25
> You're referring to his posts about medications, not those about the gates, right?-- yes, and the combination of the two at times...
>> It's fine to respond -- different points of view are encouraged here -- but if you could do so with what you see as the problems with his suggestions or with suggestions of your own, that would both address any danger *and* be civil.
-- I feel pretty strongly that that is exactly what I've done, and can't *think* of any post of mine that was uncivil...
> > There is a definite personal issue with it as well -- he's bringing up many of the bad things from my childhood, many of the reasons I put off getting help.
>
> That's a nice insight.-- Thanks.
>> But here, different points of view are encouraged, so hopefully people will be free to make up their own minds.
-- But it Offends Me, as I pointed out. Aren't my views on offense as valid as someone else's? Shouldn't he be asked to refrain from offending me further? It's in the rules of civility. If not reading the posts is the answer, then couldn't anyone post anything, and that be the answer for them as well? People didn't have to click on Kid_A's link that caused so much controversy...
> > I'm concerned that he will return again and again, even if blocked, and turn social into a rally for Christianity. Even when he has been ignored, he keeps on replying to himself.
>
> Let's cross that bridge if we come to it. As far as I can remember, he's respected his blocks. And replying to himself doesn't hurt anyone.-- Perhaps the boards could be archived more often if any poster starts filling one up with one issue, any issue...
Krazy Kat
poster:krazy kat
thread:5247
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020510/msgs/5353.html