treatment outcome in 1929??? And what was the..." /> treatment outcome in 1929??? And what was the..." />

Re: policies

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 15, 2001, at 20:09:08

In reply to Re: policies » Dr. Bob, posted by Sulpicia on April 15, 2001, at 19:32:23

> If the only supporting study offered dates from AJP 1929 and claims that
> the patients "did better," better than what? Better than the standard
> treatment outcome in 1929??? And what was the standard treatment some 70
> years ago?? Exorcism perhaps?
OK, but then what? How many studies would you require? How recent would they need to be? What kind of control groups would they need to have? It might be a lot harder to draw that line...
Bob

Thread

Re: please be civil » kate9999 » Dr. Bob kate9999 4/15/01
Re: policies Dr. Bob 4/15/01
Re: policies » Dr. Bob Sulpicia 4/15/01
Re: policies Dr. Bob 4/15/01
Re: policies stjames 4/15/01
Re: policies kate9999 4/16/01
Re: policies kate9999 4/16/01
Re: policies » Sulpicia Wendy B 4/16/01
Re: policies willow 4/16/01
Re: policies Shar 4/20/01
Re: policies Dr. Bob 4/21/01
provocateur kate9999 4/21/01
Re: provocateur » kate9999 Cam W. 4/21/01
Re: provocateur kate9999 4/21/01
Re: provocateur » kate9999 Cam W. 4/22/01
Re: provocateur JahL 4/22/01
...
Re: blocked from posting » kate9999 Dr. Bob 4/30/01

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Dr. Bob thread:1025
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20010315/msgs/1030.html

	for
in