Posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2013, at 16:58:45
In reply to Lou's reply-nonotwun? » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou PIlder on March 4, 2013, at 7:21:00
> To determine as to if all mind-altering drugs are dangerous or not, one could use the generally accepted meaning of {dangerous} to make that conclusion, which is {likely to cause harm or cause injury}.
> One way to prove, as in this case, could be to show one such in the class of psychotropic drugs that does not at all cause any harm or injury. I know of none.
> For as the sun goes from the East to the West, all of he psychotropic drugs that I know of can cause harm or injury in that they can either induce suicidal and/or homocidal thoughts ending in the taker of the drug killing themselves and/or others, or inducing diabetes, or tardive dyskinesia, or heart problems, or liver problems, or other organ problems, or huge weight gain, or sexual dysfunction, or blood disease, or eye problems, or depression of the central nervous system, or tardvie dystonia, or addiction, or a host of other harmful or injurious outcomes to not only the taker of the drug, but to innocent bystnders as a result of the taker of the drug going on shooting rsmpage and even killing their own children and mother or spouse.
> Now I ask for a name of a psychotropic drug that can not do any of those things to be posted here, then I could conclude that all psychotropic drugs can cause harm or injury if one is not found to be exempt from what the list of injuries and harm that I have posted here.Lou,
So did I get that right? You're saying all mind-altering drugs are dangerous?
Bob
PS: Everybody else, please refrain from replying while I try to understand what Lou's saying.
this signature | Show by default | Change to hide (next time)a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:1039271
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20130222/msgs/1039652.html