Saredutant doesn't look like a winner

Posted by cache-monkey on June 4, 2008, at 14:48:05

In reply to Saredutant looks like a winner, posted by Shawn. T. on July 3, 2005, at 23:07:47

I haven't been able to find anything more concrete, but the two snippets below seem to indicate that the Phase III clinicals on Saredutant did not end up showing large/significant effect sizes:
http://tinyurl.com/5ormvn
http://tinyurl.com/6oawq2
This is really a shame because I also thought this one had so much promise...

Thread

How do these drugs work? In phase III trials ravenstorm 7/3/05
...
Re: saredutant study cncgordon 9/9/05
Re: saredutant study ravenstorm 9/10/05
Re: saredutant study Tenifer 9/12/05
Re: Saredutant study (update) cncgordon 9/26/05
Re: Saredutant study (update) ravenstorm 9/27/05
Re: Saredutant study (update) cncgordon 9/27/05
Re: Saredutant study (update) trumpet 12/23/05
Re: Saredutant study (update) trumpet 12/23/05
Re: saredutant study trumpet 6/5/06
Re: saredutant study cncgordon 6/5/06
Re: saredutant study trumpet 6/5/06
Re: saredutant study » cncgordon martinrisk 7/10/07
Saredutant doesn't look like a winner cache-monkey 6/4/08
Re: Saredutant doesn't look like a winner cache-monkey 6/4/08

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:cache-monkey thread:523047
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20080528/msgs/832911.html

	for
in