Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2?

Posted by woolav on August 11, 2004, at 12:52:49

In reply to Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2?, posted by karen m. on August 10, 2004, at 11:26:51

Interesting...my pdoc said BP is very hard to diagnose because i asked her if that is what i had. She eventually dianosed me with panic disorder -and if you read about it, that itself, if left untreated, can lead to depression, major anxiety obviously and phobia's. So, since I have never had a manic episode either, i dont believe i am bi-polar (2+) You may want to get a second opinion...
S

Thread

lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? karen m. 8/10/04
Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? karen m. 8/10/04
Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? woolav 8/10/04
Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? karen m. 8/10/04
Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? woolav 8/11/04
Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? » karen m. theo 8/11/04
Re: lamictal detrimental if you aren't BPI or 2? malthus 8/11/04

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:woolav thread:375974
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20040811/msgs/376439.html

	for
in