![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 37 to 61 of 72. Go back in thread:
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 19, 2007, at 17:27:03
In reply to Another View, posted by verne on April 18, 2007, at 20:34:27
> Of all the thousands of posters I've encountered I consider Larry Hoover the *gold* standard. Knowledge, Compassion, and Sincerity.
>
> VerneVery kind of you to say that, Verne. Thank you.
Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 19, 2007, at 17:28:37
In reply to Larry Hoover is a highly valued member of this..., posted by scratchpad on April 18, 2007, at 22:24:25
> ...community. No disparaging remarks will be recognized by myself.
>
> end of story.
>
> spThanks, scratchy. Two supportive posts! I'll try to live up to your faith in me.
Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 19, 2007, at 17:29:22
In reply to Re: Larry Hoover is a highly valued member of this... » scratchpad, posted by Phillipa on April 18, 2007, at 22:33:13
> Ditto. Love Phillipa
Ditto to you, too. Thanks, J.
Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 19, 2007, at 17:31:19
In reply to awwe, verne.... » verne, posted by karen_kay on April 18, 2007, at 22:52:13
> while i may consider myself the gold standard, i wouldn't hesitate to believe most would agree with that one as well!
But everyone knows you are the diamond standard, kk. Apples and oranges!
Lar
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 19, 2007, at 18:31:38
In reply to Another View, posted by verne on April 18, 2007, at 20:34:27
> Anyway, when the smoke cleared, chemist and Larry were both warned or blocked, after *I* had provoked them. I only escaped punishment because I knew how to attack someone within the civility rules. I was Babble savvy.
Can you teach me, Verne?
Oh, never mind. ;-)
Lar
Posted by karen_kay on April 20, 2007, at 7:25:48
In reply to Re: awwe, verne.... » karen_kay, posted by Larry Hoover on April 19, 2007, at 17:31:19
if i didn't know better, you're either kissing my *ss or you do know me very well. (with the diamonds and all)
and an aries, eh?
my best (female) friend is an aries. are you too known for freaking out at walmart for them not having your favorite shade of $.99 wet and wild blush? (that sure is a sight to behold) that's assuming you wear blush of course. i am known to assume....apples and oranges huh? are you referring to my body type? i am an apple shape, you know....
Posted by Larry Hoover on April 20, 2007, at 8:43:02
In reply to well lar.. jerk trigger (myself of course) » Larry Hoover, posted by karen_kay on April 20, 2007, at 7:25:48
> if i didn't know better, you're either kissing my *ss or you do know me very well. (with the diamonds and all)
The latter, I assure you. Have you got enough engagement rings, yet? Hmmmm? I thought not.
I don't need fake blush. I'm pretty good at the real thing.
Lar
Posted by KayeBaby on April 20, 2007, at 15:44:01
In reply to Larry Hoover is a highly valued member of this..., posted by scratchpad on April 18, 2007, at 22:24:25
> ...community. No disparaging remarks will be recognized by myself.
>
> end of story.
>
> spAllow me to fling my pennies into the fray here.
I have seen no evidence of low character in Larry Hoover.
Hosta!
Kaye (my wagon has circled and is now in park) ;)
Posted by LlurpsieNoodle on April 22, 2007, at 19:47:52
In reply to Re: Larry Hoover is a highly valued member of this..., posted by KayeBaby on April 20, 2007, at 15:44:01
this thread was about Jai...
Jai, dear, I would miss you if you decided to take off for other pastures. I have enjoyed our haiku ping-pongs on the writing board.
I have enjoyed trying to figure out what the second part of your name translates to.
The first part I think I know, at least in 1 language, and it is very lovely.
yours,
-Ll
Posted by Kath on April 23, 2007, at 15:51:15
In reply to once upon a time, I never undestood why..., posted by Jai Narayan on April 9, 2007, at 22:41:31
> the goose wanted to gander...
> I am a wandering peruser now. I was an active poster but no more. I post maybe every full moon or is it new moon? I have become infrequent. but who cares anyway...
> Jai
>Jai - have you become infrequent for any particular reason?
Feeling better? feeling worse? (hope not)
:-) Kath
Posted by MCK on May 1, 2007, at 14:54:56
In reply to Another View, posted by verne on April 18, 2007, at 20:34:27
> Of all the thousands of posters I've encountered I consider Larry Hoover the *gold* standard. Knowledge, Compassion, and Sincerity.
>
> VerneAhh, alternate viewpoints are always a good thing. However, for me to form such a glowing or a negative opinion of someone's character requires my seeing that person in situations more complex.
If things of such import as character asessment and integrity could be so easily be asessed there would be far less victimization and harm done in the world.
How often does one hear "Well it was no suprise to anyone we all thought he/she was a terrible person"
And how often does one hear a variation of "It was such a shock to everyone he/she seemed like the nicest person, a pillar of the community?"
No personal casting of aspersions here, but as a broad example, it's said of sociopaths that no one leaves a conversation with a true sociopath thinking "What a nefarious individual" They leave thinking "What a great person!"
I have no desire to persue this topic of conversation via the internet as I've realized it serves no purpose to anyone. People will see what they need to see.
Posted by karen_kay on May 1, 2007, at 16:15:06
In reply to Re: Another View » verne, posted by MCK on May 1, 2007, at 14:54:56
you said: No personal casting of aspersions here, but as a broad example, it's said of sociopaths that no one leaves a conversation with a true sociopath thinking "What a nefarious individual" They leave thinking "What a great person!"
i fear i may well be a true sociopath. if one is one, does one realize it? (i do tend to think i'm rather great, actually truly wonderful.)
Posted by MCK on May 1, 2007, at 19:54:44
In reply to oh dear! » MCK, posted by karen_kay on May 1, 2007, at 16:15:06
Ah, I think if you question yourself and your motives it's unlikely. Sociopaths unlike psychopaths know the rules, which is what makes them difficult to spot, they know when and how to play along, but feel some divine right allows their personal exemption when it suits.
Now, there are plenty of occasions where rule breaking is a good thing. What I'm speaking of is the right to lie, to victimize, to commit crime, using others to ones own end I suppose.
I'll bring out the old chestnut:
"All snakes are reptiles but not all reptiles are snakes"After all 'twould be a shame to start thinking every charismatic person you meet is sociopathic. Fortunate that it's not the defining factor, it's a reminder to keep one's mind open. I've not seen too many of your posts but from the little I have seen, it looks like that's nothing you have a problem with.
Posted by karen_kay on May 1, 2007, at 20:22:26
In reply to Re: oh dear! » karen_kay, posted by MCK on May 1, 2007, at 19:54:44
don't we all do that, in some ways? i'm not saying outright manipulate the system, steal candy bars (ok, i think i've stolen liquor as a teen, but if they sold it to minors, there'd be no need to steal it, right?), act like complete vandals (ok, again bringing up teenage angst), lied (and am completely able to justify all these things in my head).
i think i'm thinking more of my afterthought first.
basically, where is the line drawn? i'm pretty good at 'getting my way'. maybe it's just because i'm so 'darn cute' and everyone's just happy to do it? it does lead me to wonder though, is that me manipulating or people just not minding me doing it?
do you even care? if not feel free to say 'hey, you're pretty darn sweet to me' and i'll be happy with that answer. i've often just wondered about that whole sociopath dx (even asked my therapist if he thought i had it. he said no and laughed, but i decided he just didn't know the 'real' me.). i seem to fit many of the descriptions (or at least feel i do). perhaps it's just guilt?
Posted by MCK on May 2, 2007, at 14:42:40
In reply to well, to be completely honest.. » MCK, posted by karen_kay on May 1, 2007, at 20:22:26
> don't we all do that, in some ways? i'm not saying outright manipulate the system, steal candy bars (ok, i think i've stolen liquor as a teen, but if they sold it to minors, there'd be no need to steal it, right?), act like complete vandals (ok, again bringing up teenage angst), lied (and am completely able to justify all these things in my head).
>Yes I think most do. I'd be less concerned with labels and more concerned with how my actions affect people. I didn't mean to portray myself as a believer in labelling people just because their actions could be categorized in some way.
As for breaking laws I can't argue that an arbitrary set of societal laws should be followed or one is a sociopath. The opposite is often true, few unjust laws would ever have been changed without having been broken, think of Rosa Parks.
If I came across as someone who championed the DSM whatever and would put the same label on Idi Amin or Jim Bakker as I would on someone who stole a candy bar or cheated on their car insurance it was completely unintentional. I hope that answers your question.
> i think i'm thinking more of my afterthought first.
>
> basically, where is the line drawn? i'm pretty good at 'getting my way'. maybe it's just because i'm so 'darn cute' and everyone's just happy to do it? it does lead me to wonder though, is that me manipulating or people just not minding me doing it?
>
> do you even care? if not feel free to say 'hey, you're pretty darn sweet to me' and i'll be happy with that answer. i've often just wondered about that whole sociopath dx (even asked my therapist if he thought i had it. he said no and laughed, but i decided he just didn't know the 'real' me.). i seem to fit many of the descriptions (or at least feel i do). perhaps it's just guilt?
Posted by karen_kay on May 2, 2007, at 19:32:14
In reply to Re: well, to be completely honest.. » karen_kay, posted by MCK on May 2, 2007, at 14:42:40
i think i'm just trying to use you as a sit in, online therapist.
i'm sorry. i do get rather concerned about my own intentions, movitations, ect.
you didn't come across as anything but someone knowledgable.
my own personal issues, i assure you. you don't appear to be casting out dx's or judgements of any sort. you just mentioned sociopaths and my eyes perked (opened?), as i've always suspected myself as one.
again, sorry for the confusion. it's my own issue dear.
Posted by MCK on May 2, 2007, at 22:34:29
In reply to oh dear yet again... » MCK, posted by karen_kay on May 2, 2007, at 19:32:14
Dear, and (perfectly sweet) Karen KayI didn't mean to sound cross. I understand those issues, which is why I probably couldn't offer any help. I too am obsessively scrutinizing my own motives, we are hindered I think a certain amount by biology, things we desire, reactions we desire.
I've arrived at the point where I believe as long as I'm constantly scrutinizing and learning, weighing out harm done and not adhering to concepts soley because they exist, then I'm doing as well as I can. That's all I would expect from anyone, but of course I'm not you, so it's probably easy for me to say. Besides, if I said any more things you may well propose to me and then I'd have to be the first to break your heart.
Posted by verne on May 3, 2007, at 1:10:28
In reply to Re: Another View » verne, posted by MCK on May 1, 2007, at 14:54:56
MCK,
Why not accept my view of Larry Hoover as the "gold standard" without quibbling? Essentially, you attempt to invalidate my experience of the Hooverite as a glowing influence. Afterall, isn't that just my view, anyway?
Would you tell someone, in real life, their view of another person was "wrong", that they should see the person in a more "complex" situation, and then suggest the object of their admiration may be a sociopath?
It would be like someone following you around the art museum telling you that you've viewed a painting in the wrong way. Can't we, at least, allow others to have their own perspectives?
verne
Posted by karen_kay on May 3, 2007, at 7:45:36
In reply to Re: oh dear yet again... » karen_kay, posted by MCK on May 2, 2007, at 22:34:29
you did notice though, you referred to me as perfect(ly). the (ly) part doesn't matter really, i pay more attention to the part in front of that. thank you.
you didn't sound (or read) cross at all dear. promise. i just wanted to be certain you knew i didn't think you were throwing around dx's and such; that it was my issue, not you accusing or what have you.
about that constant question: geez, does it ever stop? i'd like, just for one day, to stop thinking 'why do i do so little for others and so much for myself?' which only makes me feel worse. (sure, perhaps another subject entirely, possibly not.) most days, i'm the greatest person around (not most days, most minutes), but it tends to get me thinking 'ok, you've got to be a sociopath to think you're entitled to treat people the way you do.' and 'why don't you do more..' ect, ect....
oh, years of therapy and i stil haven't figured it out. i do love myself. hell, i'm pretty much the best person i know (well, you're pretty high up there in my book right now you know, but still i am rather fond of myself.), yet at the same time, i see so many others doing so much adn it gets me thinking...
and is it ever possible to know the harm done, really though? i guess i'll only know when my duckie's old enough to be telling me 'well, my therapist said.....' or when ' the verdict read in the first degree I hollered lordy lordy have a mercy on me' (sorry, johnny cash fan? at least a cocaine fan?)
please do entice me to propose. i'm rather fond of a broken heart, i must say!
and have a great day.
fondly,
kk
Posted by MCK on May 3, 2007, at 13:29:50
In reply to what's the harm in asking though? cocaine trigger » MCK, posted by karen_kay on May 3, 2007, at 7:45:36
> and is it ever possible to know the harm done, really though? i guess i'll only know when my duckie's old enough to be telling me 'well, my therapist said.....'You got a smile out of me there, it doesn't happen often.
After I wrote the post and was thinking about it, (yes I do obsess too) I thought "How is one to know if harm done doesn't result in being help done, sometimes people learn through negative experience and perhaps saves them from a worse experience" and so it goes. I suspect we're both on the same carousel as far as analysis is concerned.
Posted by MCK on May 3, 2007, at 13:51:52
In reply to Re: Another View, posted by verne on May 3, 2007, at 1:10:28
> Would you tell someone, in real life, their view of another person was "wrong", that they should see the person in a more "complex" situation, and then suggest the object of their admiration may be a sociopath?
>I said that I did not want to pursue this as it serves no purpose to anyone. Perhaps that did not stand out to you as a summation of what you have just said.
My response is to clarify (something I wish I did not have to do, as saying it once should have been enough) I was not suggesting the "object of admiration" was a sociopath, I said the following:
"CASTING ASPERSIONS AT NO ONE IN PARTICULAR"
It may come as a surprise, but I also meant it.I will not respond further, as what I wrote at the beginning of this post I also meant.
I am careful to write what I mean, and become perhaps overly annoyed when some of what I've said is overlooked or dismissed, and from that edit incorrect conclusions and inferences derived.I feel I could type the Greek alphabet and it would be interpreted to mean what you've pre concluded.
Posted by karen_kay on May 4, 2007, at 6:57:43
In reply to Re: what's the harm in asking though? cocaine trigger » karen_kay, posted by MCK on May 3, 2007, at 13:29:50
of either my proposal or my sociopath dx?
glad to make you smile.
i think i'm on the right path, as my duckie is almost always smiling. as a child, the only pictures i've found i'm crying in. that has to say something. (at least i know he won't be questioning if he's a sociopath, perhaps he'll just know it?)
at least i'm not the only one questioning motivations, hurt, harm done, what sort of breakfast cereal to eat (oh wait, we didn't discuss that one. i was thinking about feeding my niece).
hey, you know what? i appreciate not being talked down to. or at least not feeling talked down to. i've been 'touchy' lately (extremely). i appreciate you 'playing' along (not that i've been playing with you,you get what i'm saying), but with my meds, they do make me feel extremely dumb and certainly make me act that way (or feel that i act that way).
anywho. i'm always thinking (take for example yesterday. a nice neighbor stopped by and mowed my yard. he mowed a small part of it once before and i wrote him a little thank you note, so i guess he took it upon himself to mow my whole yard while i sat inside, drank beer and watched him, pacing thinking 'i can't even go outside and keep him company because he's on a riding mower and what would i do, walk aroudn beside him?' besides i had company (who couldn't stop staring at him) and i couldn't be rude to my company (and my mother in law). how horrible is that? but, i guess it's his choice, right? guess a thank you note goes a long way?) somehow i'm taking advantage. but, if i don't do it first, someone else will and do it far worse?
oh well, better to be taken by a sweet girl (hey, that's woman) like me than a mean old man who swipes your purse/wallet right out of your hand? at least somehow i convince you it's your own idea?
geez, maybe i do need those antipsychotics the dr keeps suggesting....
Posted by MCK on May 4, 2007, at 13:16:10
In reply to aren't convinced yet? » MCK, posted by karen_kay on May 4, 2007, at 6:57:43
> of either my proposal or my sociopath dx?
No. never convinced of anything. I think I'd like it if I could be convinced of something.
>
> glad to make you smile.
>It hurt.
as a child, the only pictures i've found i'm crying in. that has to say something. (at least i know he won't be questioning if he's a sociopath, perhaps he'll just know it?)
>I rarely allowed my picture to be taken, in the ones that were I'm crying too, or about to.
> at least i'm not the only one questioning motivations, hurt, harm done, what sort of breakfast cereal to eat (oh wait, we didn't discuss that one. i was thinking about feeding my niece).
>Sigh, yes. Add the occasional "Maybe we have control over nothing, we think we do but we're only doing our part, some, Judas style, in a preplanned metaphysical dance that will make sense only at the end of time" and that about covers it for me too.
> hey, you know what? i appreciate not being talked down to. or at least not feeling talked down to. i've been 'touchy' lately (extremely). i appreciate you 'playing' along (not that i've been playing with you,you get what i'm saying), but with my meds, they do make me feel extremely dumb and certainly make me act that way (or feel that i act that way).
>I had no inclination to talk down to you, and it was good for this cranky old soldier too. *smiles*
Posted by Gabbi-2 on May 4, 2007, at 13:25:24
In reply to Re: what's the harm in asking though? cocaine trigger » karen_kay, posted by MCK on May 3, 2007, at 13:29:50
Pardon my inability to phrase things to your exact liking today : )
This goes wayyyy back, but I've been blocked and am too lazy to back track to the exact post.
If any of your posts were indirectly directly in defense of me, I wanted to let you know that it's not necessary. Appreciated, but not necessary. The only reason I'm even daring to think that (smirk) is because I think you ever so gallantly lept to my defence a long time ago when I was bothered. I can fight my own battles ya know, and this one is a dead non issue, well to call it even that is giving it too much credit.
Posted by MCK on May 4, 2007, at 18:47:08
In reply to Yo MC » MCK, posted by Gabbi-2 on May 4, 2007, at 13:25:24
Gabbi my darlin', one thing I have since learned is that you're well able to handle things in your own Gabbi style. I had been referring to other matters.
TK
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.