![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 19 to 43 of 99. Go back in thread:
Posted by special_k on March 27, 2006, at 19:30:46
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by verne on March 27, 2006, at 8:14:07
i don't have a problem with nudity and appreciation of form...
i do have a problem with stuff that is made with the intention (and viewed with the intention) of j*cking off to it.
i think that viewing pictures that way...
makes it more likely that one appraises people irl that way...would you feel just a little bit embarrased for your mother or your sister or your daughter if they were in teh industry?
regardless of whether they are pleased with it or not...
wouldn't you not feel so good with the thought that guys are viewing them as... an object whose whole purpose is to please them?
i would...
but maybe thats just me.
Posted by Phillipa on March 27, 2006, at 19:47:24
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by special_k on March 27, 2006, at 19:30:46
I just thought of something how come prostitution is legal in Holland? Love Phillipa
Posted by verne on March 27, 2006, at 20:56:32
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by special_k on March 27, 2006, at 19:30:46
I don't think there's anything wrong with erotic images and self gratification. As long as no one else is harmed, another person's viewing material and how they use it, or their body, should be a private matter.
I, myself, think smut is good clean fun.
Verne
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 9:57:53
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by verne on March 27, 2006, at 20:56:32
i never thought of it as objectifying women any more than men. Maybe girlie magazines, but there is always Playgirl. It certainly promotes expectations that are impossible for real people to measure up to, but that's as true, if not even more so, for men than women. Good grief, I remember things going on for so long that I got bored even watching it. Talk about inducing performance anxiety.
And if you think of those men as your brother or father, it would pretty much take the pleasure out of enjoying it.
I'm sad to say that my husband totally took the joy out of videos for me by reminding me of the likely realities of the porn movie industry. The health risks, etc. Once it was brought to my attention, it was kind of like trying to eat chicken soup after my ethics report on animal husbandry.
I'm not sure that Playgirl and Playboy have the same issues? For those who find static anatomical depictions stimulating. Thank heavens for the written word. No one was harmed in the creation of that fantasy. (Of course, I can see where written depictions of violent fantasies could be harmful just as other violent games, literature, songs, etc. could be harmful in that they desensitize people to violence or inspire desires in people that might result in violence. Even while in other people they may be a relatively harmless way to discharge those urges.)
I rather suspect this may belong on Politics though.
Posted by Glydin on March 28, 2006, at 10:06:56
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 9:57:53
> For those who find static anatomical depictions stimulating.
~~~ Tends to be a XY chromosomes thing
> Thank heavens for the written word.~~~ Tends to be an XX chromosomes thing
But, I do have to add the essential "everybody's and everymind's different" as I don't what to be an all or nothing thinker.
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 10:14:50
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » Dinah, posted by Glydin on March 28, 2006, at 10:06:56
:)
I have to admit finding Playgirl very educational in my youth. I remember my mother even offered to buy it since we were underage. And I still enjoy it as a novelty from time to time. You know, if there's an interesting article in it. ;)
Posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 11:04:06
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by verne on March 27, 2006, at 20:56:32
> I don't think there's anything wrong with erotic images and self gratification. As long as no one else is harmed, another person's viewing material and how they use it, or their body, should be a private matter.
but how do you know whether anyone is harmed or not and really do you care when you are viewing those images?
if your daughter didn't feel harmed...
how would you feel is she was a pornstar?proud... or concerned for her?
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 11:10:05
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » verne, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 11:04:06
How about his son?
How would he feel if his son or daughter was a porn star? I'm not sure that's a gender issue at all.
Posted by Phil on March 28, 2006, at 12:38:09
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » special_k, posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 11:10:05
Dinah...Once it was brought to my attention, it was kind of like trying to eat chicken soup after my ethics report on animal husbandry.
Haha!!
Posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 13:40:03
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » verne, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 11:04:06
I'm not ashamed if that's what you're getting at:
Not ashamed to view pornographic material. Not ashamed to masturbate. And not ashamed of my "pornstar daughter" - if that's what she wants to do.
Verne
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 16:41:24
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » special_k, posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 13:40:03
I don't think you have anything to be ashamed of.
Masturbation is a healthy and safe sexual outlet. I wish it were promoted more as an alternative to riskier activities.
And I'm rather annoyed with my husband for ruining my enjoyment of the movies.
Posted by Bobby on March 28, 2006, at 17:07:16
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » verne, posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 16:41:24
you're going to arouse Ted from hibernation---with his erotic literature. :)
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 17:17:25
In reply to Careful Dinah » Dinah, posted by Bobby on March 28, 2006, at 17:07:16
Posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 19:30:31
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » special_k, posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 13:40:03
> I'm not ashamed if that's what you're getting at:
I'm not trying to evoke shame. I would hope that you wouldn't be ashamed of your daughter no matter what she may choose to do in life.
And masterbation (IMO) seems like a victimless crime (which is to say not a crime at all).
Regarding the photographs / movies...
I'm not so sure it is victimless...
But whatever. To each their own or something.
Posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 19:33:39
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » special_k, posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 11:10:05
> How about his son?
> How would he feel if his son or daughter was a porn star? I'm not sure that's a gender issue at all.Oh. Well typically if a female bares all for the camera / sleeps with a lot of people then she is considered a 'slut' or a 'whore' which is a derogatory way of looking at her and the situation...
Typically if a male bares all for the camera / sleeps with a lot of people then he is considered a 'stud' or something equally positive.
Societies double standard...
Hence... It tends to have more weight when females are involved.
The notion that other people view the pictures and are more likely to judge the person involved derogatorily.
Whereas if you are a guy and it is your son... You are probably to start making comments about how he gets it from his father etc etc.
I do feel rather ill...
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 19:40:47
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » Dinah, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 19:33:39
I would have hoped that double standard was long since dead and buried.
But then I've recently decided that I may perhaps have to consider the sad possibility that I'm an idealist.
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 19:43:48
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » Dinah, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 19:33:39
There's an article in a recent Psychology Today that contained a mention of recent research that showed that men who viewed pornography did not, in fact, have a negative or derogatory view of women. That on fact, on average, they had a slightly more positive view of women.
I don't know the reliability of Psychology Today as a source. But it would be interesting to see the source studies.
Posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 20:33:06
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » verne, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 19:30:31
If you're not trying to evoke shame why play the "proud of your daughter" card? If I'm not "proud", what am I?
You argue about how others view women as "sluts", and men as "studs" - I sure don't. Even my pornstar daughter doesn't.
Earlier you said that part of the problem with pornography is the viewer's intention, what he intended to do with it - j*rk off, or whatever. And that somehow, j*rking off, caused him to objectify, or view, women in a bad light in real life.
Sometimes you argue about what I might be thinking, other times, about what others might think. I just don't think me j*rking off is up to debate.
Verne
Posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 20:34:40
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » verne, posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 20:33:06
Posted by Kath on March 28, 2006, at 20:51:57
In reply to A small victory for womankind?, posted by milly on March 25, 2006, at 16:09:41
Good for you as to getting the magazines away from kid-level & having the store owners put kid-appropriate stuff there instead. I think that's the BIG success.
:-)) Kath
PS - my son had porn videos sitting around. He & his girlfriend apparently liked watching them (she's "bi"). The thing that really got me was that the girls on the covers that I saw did NOT - repeat, NOT look like they were enjoying themselves at all...particularly in certains photos - can't go into detail here obviously, but when they were involved in a certain activity. They did NOT look happy at ALL....some of them looked quite miserable.
Anyway, thanks for getting the message across to the store people.
K
> I think I have won!!!
>
> My local newsagents keeps putting degrading 'mens' magazines on a stand at kiddies eye level just as you go in the door.
> I tried asking nicely -no change
> Next day I scooped them all up and took them to the counter where I meant to place them but unfortunatly they slipped (they are saying I threw them) all over the floor, counter and assistant (whoops!) - no change
> Next day I removed them and hid them behind the chocolates - no change
> Finally I moved them to deep within the chest freezer, either they havent found them yet (or they are frozen solid) but today they have been replaced by childrens comics
> Yeah I won, I won
> Ok slightly hypomanic possibly but it was fun!
> milly
Posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 21:05:55
In reply to Re: A small victory for womankind? » milly, posted by Kath on March 28, 2006, at 20:51:57
I don't think vandalizing a store is a "big success".
Posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 21:19:03
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger » verne, posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 20:33:06
> If you're not trying to evoke shame why play the "proud of your daughter" card? If I'm not "proud", what am I?
Concerned. Concerned about her choice in life (assuming it was a choice). That was the other option I mentioned. I just kind of wondered whether it would be something that you would want for her. Or whether you would be concerned.
> You argue about how others view women as "sluts", and men as "studs" - I sure don't. Even my pornstar daughter doesn't.Ah. Maybe I get out to unsavory bars a little too much...
> Earlier you said that part of the problem with pornography is the viewer's intention, what he intended to do with it - j*rk off, or whatever. And that somehow, j*rking off, caused him to objectify, or view, women in a bad light in real life.Objectification. That is my biggest problem yes. If two adults consent to do that to each other then yeah ok none of my business. I kind of like to think that sexual activity can be an act between two subjects rather than two objects but I don't think most people see it that way...
I just wondered whether you would be concerned if your daughter was a porn star... If you might feel concerned about what people were thinking when looking at her picture etc. If you might feel concerned about how she might be treated IRL if people saw her on the street...
I don't know. Maybe not.
> Sometimes you argue about what I might be thinking, other times, about what others might think. I just don't think me j*rking off is up to debate.
Ok.
I guess it just makes me feel sad that sex isn't thought of as an activity between two subjects.
I feel sad about that.
But maybe 'cause I've been faced with a lot of objectification...
Which I find to be mostly oriented towards women (in practice)
Though some women seem to be learning to return the favour...I just feel sad in response is all.
Posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 21:19:38
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 21:19:03
and for people who have been sexually abused / raped...
i understand how it can be a trigger.
Posted by verne on March 28, 2006, at 21:59:52
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 21:19:03
I simply can't begin to understand this "objectification" you keep mentioning. I struggle to comprehend how two subjects can get together without an object and a verb in there somewhere. Even rad, crazy, wild, soulful, sex between two adults has an object in there somewhere. Two "subjects" never meet.
And even if I "objectified" my lover like crazy - and j*rked off, while we had sex, is it wrong? In the end, we are all j*rking off.
You have no idea how much I am in love with the "object" of my love. I (subject) love (her) object and She (subject) loves (me).
Verne
Posted by Dinah on March 28, 2006, at 22:14:45
In reply to Re: Porn...what's the big deal? posible trigger, posted by special_k on March 28, 2006, at 21:19:03
> I guess it just makes me feel sad that sex isn't thought of as an activity between two subjects.
Ouch. Forgive my ignorance. I had honestly thought that masturbation was pretty much universal. I don't think I've ever realized I've met someone who hasn't done it. And even my religious book on parenting emphasized that it was a natural activity and not to shame kids for doing it, but to just tell them that it's an activity to be done in private.
Boy, I am really naive.
But, Verne, I assure you, I think it's terrific that you're so matter of fact about it. Please don't feel ashamed.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.