![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 181 to 205 of 222. Go back in thread:
Posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2009, at 8:24:29
In reply to Re: resolution and peace » Dr. Bob, posted by Sigismund on March 5, 2009, at 1:24:42
> > Ongoing evolution and growth
>
> with (or without) whom?With those who want to see where this journey takes us?
Bob
Posted by muffled on March 5, 2009, at 13:26:36
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2009, at 8:24:29
> > > Ongoing evolution and growth
> >
> > with (or without) whom?
>
> With those who want to see where this journey takes us?
>
> Bob*Fair enuf.
I just wish there was some way we could make this clear somehow....so people could be safer. But I guess there is no safe place in this life.
For me, I have so much confusion in my head at times, that I need a place where there is not such evolution and growth. Which is perhaps less stimulating, but at this time is all I can handle.
I appeciate that Bob has expressed some emotion and more clearly some of his thots.
Thanks.
Take care.
M
Posted by fayeroe on March 5, 2009, at 14:08:13
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2009, at 8:24:29
> > > Ongoing evolution and growth
> >
> > with (or without) whom?
>
> With those who want to see where this journey takes us?
>
> BobI wonder how it would feel to have a safe place where I am not waiting for the other shoe to drop?
Posted by Toph on March 6, 2009, at 10:38:02
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2009, at 0:01:34
>
> Ongoing evolution and growth does mean there may not be permanent resolution and peace. Still, that's the option I'd prefer.
>
> BobSystems theorists suggest that evolution is less of a goal or choice than a natural by-product of conflict and instability.
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Systems_Theory/Evolution_&_Growth
Posted by Sigismund on March 6, 2009, at 13:17:58
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by Toph on March 6, 2009, at 10:38:02
Posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:47:01
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2009, at 8:24:29
>>With those who want to see where this journey takes us?
Bob >>
You have included yourself in the us, however, your journey is remarkably different than others. Yours is not from the same can of worms as ours by any stretch of the imagination. I think the potential for us to be hurt is much more greater than yours!
But i guess like muffled said it nice you shared some of your thoughts.
I am amazed at times about the apparent lack of flexibility. (in how you view the things we perceive as threatening you view as a journey.)
oh well I guess we made a nice try however futile.
rsk
Posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:48:08
In reply to Re: hopes and desires » rskontos, posted by fayeroe on March 4, 2009, at 14:45:03
> > ..I don't think it can be addressed once and for all, I think it needs to keep evolving...
> >
> > Dr. Bob,
> >
> > Perhaps you think so, but to me it is obvious that this is a painful thing to posters and evolution in this sense (ongoing discussion) seems to be even more painful. No resolution, no peace. JMHO
> >
> > rsk
>
> Excellent point. Cutting off the discussion before issues are taken care of has happened before.
>
> I hate that. Babble won't grow and evolve without the process of healing that comes when the circle is completed. Sad.
>
>
Thanks, and I agree fayeroe, I agree. Too bad Dr. Bob can't see it more our way.rsk
Posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:48:51
In reply to Re: hopes and desires, posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:48:08
Posted by fayeroe on March 6, 2009, at 15:58:46
In reply to Re: hopes and desires, posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:48:08
I remember when Jennifer Anniston said that Brad Pitt was missing a sensitivity chip.
Posted by Midnightblue on March 6, 2009, at 16:51:10
In reply to Re: resolution and peace » Dr. Bob, posted by fayeroe on March 5, 2009, at 14:08:13
I'm not sure. Just when I begin to think I'm in a safe place it starts raining shoes.
MB
Posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 17:30:31
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:47:01
Posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 17:31:31
In reply to Re: hopes and desires » rskontos, posted by fayeroe on March 6, 2009, at 15:58:46
Yeah,
I believe someone else here (Dr. Bob) may suffer from the same ailment,
rsk
Posted by muffled on March 6, 2009, at 18:41:06
In reply to Re: hopes and desires » fayeroe, posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 17:31:31
Bob is Bob, and this is his site.
I have FINALLY figgered that out.
Ya, he definately got probs, but who don't I suppose.
But his issues make it so I can't be here which is unfortunate.
I am thinking he not really a bad guy.
He just who he is.
And I can't handle it right now.
Please all.
Don't beat yourselves up.
Take care yourselves.
M
Posted by fayeroe on March 6, 2009, at 19:10:24
In reply to Re: resolution and peace » fayeroe, posted by Midnightblue on March 6, 2009, at 16:51:10
> I'm not sure. Just when I begin to think I'm in a safe place it starts raining shoes.
>
> MBheels or flats?
Posted by Dr. Bob on March 8, 2009, at 0:57:19
In reply to Re: resolution and peace, posted by rskontos on March 6, 2009, at 15:47:01
> I wonder how it would feel to have a safe place where I am not waiting for the other shoe to drop?
>
> fayeroeHas it been hard to find a place like that? Maybe some posters stay because they hope and desire to avoid shoes. And maybe they like the idea that my shoes follow rules.
> Systems theorists suggest that evolution is less of a goal or choice than a natural by-product of conflict and instability.
>
> TophThat makes sense to me. I suggest that conflict and instability are a natural by-product of people coming together.
> You have included yourself in the us, however, your journey is remarkably different than others. ... I think the potential for us to be hurt is much more greater than yours!
>
> I am amazed at times about the apparent lack of flexibility. (in how you view the things we perceive as threatening you view as a journey.)
>
> rskAll our journeys are different. Do you think your potential to benefit might also be much greater than mine? All our perspectives are different, too. I wouldn't see someone as inflexible just because their view wasn't the same as mine.
Bob
Posted by fayeroe on March 8, 2009, at 9:50:02
In reply to Re: shoes, conflict, and journeys, posted by Dr. Bob on March 8, 2009, at 0:57:19
> > I wonder how it would feel to have a safe place where I am not waiting for the other shoe to drop?
> >
> > fayeroe
>
> Has it been hard to find a place like that? Maybe some posters stay because they hope and desire to avoid shoes. And maybe they like the idea that my shoes follow rules.I've told you this before, I stay because I have friends here. Do I not have the right, as a poster, to wish things were better. I believe that you have a long way to go before you understand what we have been saying to you in the long thread.
I think that the idea of your shoes following rules is a bit of a stretch.
>
> > Systems theorists suggest that evolution is less of a goal or choice than a natural by-product of conflict and instability.
> >
> > Toph
>
> That makes sense to me. I suggest that conflict and instability are a natural by-product of people coming together.Funny how you think.
>
> > You have included yourself in the us, however, your journey is remarkably different than others. ... I think the potential for us to be hurt is much more greater than yours!
> >
> > I am amazed at times about the apparent lack of flexibility. (in how you view the things we perceive as threatening you view as a journey.)
> >
> > rsk
>
> All our journeys are different. Do you think your potential to benefit might also be much greater than mine? All our perspectives are different, too. I wouldn't see someone as inflexible just because their view wasn't the same as mine.Shaking head.....poor Bob.
>
> Bob
Posted by Sigismund on March 8, 2009, at 16:09:09
In reply to Re: shoes, conflict, and journeys » Dr. Bob, posted by fayeroe on March 8, 2009, at 9:50:02
By my count Bob has appeared on this thread 14 times, including the 2 blocks.
This might be a recent record.
Posted by rskontos on March 8, 2009, at 17:31:20
In reply to Re: shoes, conflict, and journeys, posted by Dr. Bob on March 8, 2009, at 0:57:19
.... I wouldn't see someone as inflexible just because their view wasn't the same as mine.
Bob ...
Dr Bob,
I don't see you as inflexible because your views are different than I. That is narrowminded and I hope I am anything but that. Why I think of you as being inflexible is that the thread's message seems to have eluded you. That is all. We are trying to get resolution on this board to discuss things that bother us and yet you seem to miss the point. Again.
I am done with this. It seems that we will not conquer this great divide.
rsk
Posted by Dr. Bob on March 9, 2009, at 4:31:53
In reply to Re: shoes, conflict, and journeys » Dr. Bob, posted by rskontos on March 8, 2009, at 17:31:20
> > > I wonder how it would feel to have a safe place where I am not waiting for the other shoe to drop?
> >
> > Has it been hard to find a place like that? Maybe some posters stay because they hope and desire to avoid shoes.
>
> Do I not have the right, as a poster, to wish things were better. I believe that you have a long way to go before you understand what we have been saying to you in the long thread.
>
> fayeroeI understand that you (and other posters) wish it felt safer here. Is that accurate? You certainly have the right to wish that.
> Why I think of you as being inflexible is that the thread's message seems to have eluded you. That is all. We are trying to get resolution on this board to discuss things that bother us and yet you seem to miss the point. Again.
>
> I am done with this. It seems that we will not conquer this great divide.
>
> rskWould you say I'm dense (not getting your point) or inflexible (getting it, but disagreeing with you)? Either way, I understand that it could feel like a great divide. If I'm not getting it, I'd still like to, could you repeat it?
Bob
Posted by Zeba on April 3, 2009, at 22:16:54
In reply to Re: safety and division, posted by Dr. Bob on March 9, 2009, at 4:31:53
My monthly or month and a half look back on this site, and I see nothing has changed. I think this site should be called "blockobabble." I would have to agree that blocks over a few weeks are punitive. Perhaps if I wait 3 months to look again things will have changed. Nope I am kidding myself.
Zeba
Posted by muffled on April 3, 2009, at 22:37:50
In reply to Re: safety and division, posted by Dr. Bob on March 9, 2009, at 4:31:53
> Would you say I'm dense (not getting your point) or inflexible (getting it, but disagreeing with you)? Either way, I understand that it could feel like a great divide. If I'm not getting it, I'd still like to, could you repeat it?
>
> BobWell FWIW, I think you come across as both.....
I think you appear dense, cuz you do not undertsand what we keep saying to you. Not to say you ARE dense, but that you seem to be unable to get the point. We all have our weak spots and perhaps this is yours. Not that you are a bad person....but ya, because of your position as owner of this site, its kinda frustrating trying to deal with you on this stuff.
As for inflexible(getting it, but disagreeing with you)? ......I don't think its neccessarily that(though it may be the case some of the time). I once again wonder if you appear inflexible because you DON'T get it.
So,
both.
Or maybe not.
I don't know you, alls I know is from what little interaction there has been here on babble. I don't know your values or life circumstances or anything about your FOO. So no I don't have a clue.
I'd like to think you do mean well, but perhaps just suffer a slight deficit in understanding some things.
Or maybe...
well.
I dunno, I like to just keep the, 'you mean well' thot.
Take care,
Muffled
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 4, 2009, at 13:09:55
In reply to Re: safety and division » Dr. Bob, posted by Zeba on April 3, 2009, at 22:16:54
> My monthly or month and a half look back on this site, and I see nothing has changed. ... I would have to agree that blocks over a few weeks are punitive. Perhaps if I wait 3 months to look again things will have changed. Nope I am kidding myself.
Well, every block has a punitive component, in that it's "a penalty imposed for a fault, offense, or violation".
I see continuing to check back as a sign that you see change as possible. Could I suggest that you be the change you wish to see? That would take more than coming by every month or month and a half, though.
Bob
Posted by fayeroe on April 4, 2009, at 14:07:23
In reply to Re: change, posted by Dr. Bob on April 4, 2009, at 13:09:55
> > My monthly or month and a half look back on this site, and I see nothing has changed. ... I would have to agree that blocks over a few weeks are punitive. Perhaps if I wait 3 months to look again things will have changed. Nope I am kidding myself.
>
> Well, every block has a punitive component, in that it's "a penalty imposed for a fault, offense, or violation".
>
> I see continuing to check back as a sign that you see change as possible. Could I suggest that you be the change you wish to see? That would take more than coming by every month or month and a half, though.
>
> BobAha! The PBCs and PBSs are like an offender being "written up" in prison....(I see guards provoking offenders to the point that a "write up" is done.)
After being "written up" three times, it is almost a done deal that the offender will go to "Ad Seg"......isolated from the remainder of the population of his/her housing unit.....If a guard has it in for a certain offender, they will move heaven and earth to "slap a paper" on that person..
A block is our "Ad Seg"....Wow! Sometimes the offender gets shipped back to Huntsville after being in ad seg.
Hmmmmmmmmm. Is being shipped out the next move here? Pat
Posted by Zeba on April 5, 2009, at 0:14:20
In reply to Re: change, posted by Dr. Bob on April 4, 2009, at 13:09:55
> > My monthly or month and a half look back on this site, and I see nothing has changed. ... I would have to agree that blocks over a few weeks are punitive. Perhaps if I wait 3 months to look again things will have changed. Nope I am kidding myself.
>
> Well, every block has a punitive component, in that it's "a penalty imposed for a fault, offense, or violation".
>
> I see continuing to check back as a sign that you see change as possible. Could I suggest that you be the change you wish to see? That would take more than coming by every month or month and a half, though.
>
> BobI thought I had posted a response but probably hit the wrong button. I doubt I will post for a long time if ever after this post. I feel as if Babble is a fading memory of the past. My only concern is for others who come here hoping to be understood and be accepted. In my opinion the longer and longer blocks are not only punitive, they are abusive and do not serve any useful purpose. I do not want to be a part of what I consider abusive policies. Sorry, but it is what it is.
Zeba
Posted by Sigismund on April 5, 2009, at 2:00:59
In reply to Re: change » Dr. Bob, posted by Zeba on April 5, 2009, at 0:14:20
>longer blocks are not only punitive, they are abusive and do not serve any useful purpose
They get rid of people for 52 weeks, but over and above that?
Zeugma, zazenducke, verne, alex.......did they really give anyone here or back then that much grief?
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.