Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 476237

Shown: posts 26 to 50 of 53. Go back in thread:

 

Re: being told to believe something » Dinah

Posted by gardenergirl on March 31, 2005, at 11:57:19

In reply to Re: being told to believe something » gardenergirl, posted by Dinah on March 31, 2005, at 4:25:08

Oh my, there's more? I didn't realize.
gg

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob

Posted by rayww on April 1, 2005, at 11:22:23

In reply to Another request, Dr. Bob, posted by Dinah on March 27, 2005, at 12:49:49

Lou, like many of us, needs a place where he can write safely. I realize you had intended the Faith board to be that safe place, but under general guidelines, it can't work. Lou wants to write. A reason he criticizes others is because of the way he perceives he has been treated by us. I have compassion for people who have needs like his.

You have quite a few new boards, and all seem to be successful. I'd like to propose one more just for people like Lou who have had an experiance they would like to share, but can't anywhere else. I would name the new board, "Experiance", because with the "a" instead of "e" it opens up the word to include things that may not be quite right with the world.

Guidelines:
- A board for the sharing of spiritual experiences that are or seem real.
- You may ask questions for clarification, but please do not criticize or put down what is very real and sacred to the writer.

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » rayww

Posted by 10derHeart on April 1, 2005, at 17:13:28

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob, posted by rayww on April 1, 2005, at 11:22:23

I'm - obviously - not Dr. Bob, rayww, but I was thinking - couldn't Lou (and others) post these experiences on the Writing board?

It seems to fit into the guidelines stated at the top...?

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob

Posted by rayww on April 1, 2005, at 17:52:10

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » rayww, posted by 10derHeart on April 1, 2005, at 17:13:28

> I'm - obviously - not Dr. Bob, rayww, but I was thinking - couldn't Lou (and others) post these experiences on the Writing board?
>
> It seems to fit into the guidelines stated at the top...?


I suppose Lou (and others) might share a short poem or something about the experience on the Writing Board, just as they might relate it to some of the other boards, but not to share the whole book.

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » rayww

Posted by alexandra_k on April 1, 2005, at 21:23:40

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob, posted by rayww on April 1, 2005, at 17:52:10

Not the whole book???

I have posted pretty lengthy stuff...

I hope I aren't just cluttering up the server...

But unless I get asked to stop I quite like putting stuff up there...

Why couldn't Lou post a book (in parts) over on writing to share his experience???

I think it is a nice idea.

I had suggested that he share over on social because the faith board added restrictions didn't apply there.

But writing.

Perfect.

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob

Posted by Spoc on April 1, 2005, at 23:20:57

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » rayww, posted by alexandra_k on April 1, 2005, at 21:23:40

> I think it is a nice idea.
> writing.
> Perfect.

That occured to me too and I also think it sounds like a good solution. So I thought maybe since he hasn't, it may involve a principle for Lou...

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » Spoc

Posted by alexandra_k on April 2, 2005, at 3:16:30

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob, posted by Spoc on April 1, 2005, at 23:20:57

I'm not sure, Spoc. Sometimes people like to post their messages on certain boards because they feel like they know the people more of a particular board and want to share their experiences with those people. Maybe Lou wanted to share his experiences with the people he knows off the faith board.

But I don't know.

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » alexandra_k

Posted by Spoc on April 2, 2005, at 11:32:32

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » Spoc, posted by alexandra_k on April 2, 2005, at 3:16:30

> I'm not sure, Spoc. Sometimes people like to post their messages on certain boards because they feel like they know the people more of a particular board and want to share their experiences with those people. Maybe Lou wanted to share his experiences with the people he knows off the faith board.

I thought it may partly be that, and/or that in his opinion, he is seeking what he feels is equal latitude, in that very specific place. But I also know I am definitely not up to speed enough on this matter to be surmising.

 

Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » Spoc

Posted by alexandra_k on April 2, 2005, at 16:33:50

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » alexandra_k, posted by Spoc on April 2, 2005, at 11:32:32

I don't know much about it either - but that has never stopped me speculating before ;-)

 

Re: Another request

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2005, at 20:39:54

In reply to Re: Another request, Dr. Bob » rayww, posted by 10derHeart on April 1, 2005, at 17:13:28

> couldn't Lou (and others) post these experiences on the Writing board?
>
> It seems to fit into the guidelines stated at the top...?

It's nice to see Lou getting some support, but I'm afraid those guidelines include being civil...

Bob

 

Re: Another request » Dr. Bob

Posted by alexandra_k on April 2, 2005, at 20:58:08

In reply to Re: Another request, posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2005, at 20:39:54

> I'm afraid those guidelines include being civil...

Oh. I didn't realise there was a more general problem with incivility. I thought it was more to do with the added restrictions that were specific to the faith board...

 

Dr. Bob, Dr. Bob, Dr. Bob....

Posted by Dinah on April 2, 2005, at 21:00:05

In reply to Re: Another request, posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2005, at 20:39:54

Couldn't you have found a more sensitive way to put that?

Saying that Lou relating his experience doesn't conform to Faith board guidelines, or Babble guidelines is surely more sensitive than saying that it is uncivil? After all, Lou is speaking of an intensely personal religious experience that changed his life.

I take it you have abandoned the idea of modifying Faith board guidelines?

Can you help us, Dr. Bob? We wish to convey to Lou that we understand his feelings and wish to hear what he wants to communicate. But we're stymied, and you're in the best position to help us come up with solutions.

 

Re: Another request » Dr. Bob

Posted by 10derHeart on April 2, 2005, at 21:03:38

In reply to Re: Another request, posted by Dr. Bob on April 2, 2005, at 20:39:54

>> It's nice to see Lou getting some support, but I'm afraid those guidelines include being civil...
>
> Bob

Okay. So...then there is something that will be inherently un-civil in what Lou would post about the Rider on Writing, correct? The same issue that's been discussed before about why it can't be said on Faith....? (trying to catch up here :))

 

Re: Another request » 10derHeart

Posted by Dinah on April 2, 2005, at 21:10:25

In reply to Re: Another request » Dr. Bob, posted by 10derHeart on April 2, 2005, at 21:03:38

Only insofar as it relates to what the Rider told Lou that he must do, in the form of worshipping him, that Dr. Bob believes might put down other people who worship a god or gods differently, or don't worship a god or gods at all.

I disagree, since the Rider, to my knowledge, did not say that everyone must do what he's telling Lou to do. Or that anyone who didn't do what he's telling Lou to do would go to Hell or anything.

And if the Rider did say either of those things, I agree that Lou shouldn't post them. Not because they're inherently uncivil (because many religions claim that they're the Only Path) but because they violate Faith board guidelines of claiming the Only Path. Not that I'm aware that the Rider did claim that the Gates were the Only Path...

 

Re: Another request » Dinah

Posted by alexandra_k on April 2, 2005, at 21:16:45

In reply to Re: Another request » 10derHeart, posted by Dinah on April 2, 2005, at 21:10:25

> And if the Rider did say either of those things, I agree that Lou shouldn't post them. Not because they're inherently uncivil (because many religions claim that they're the Only Path) but because they violate Faith board guidelines of claiming the Only Path. Not that I'm aware that the Rider did claim that the Gates were the Only Path...


Yup. I am confused. I have posted about atheism on different boards. Not explicitly on the faith board (because of the special guidelines there) but on other boards. I don't see how Lou's stuff is uncivil, and I think it is questionable as to whether it is even against the faith board guidelines (as Dinah has been saying).

???

Dr Bob???

 

Lou's response to DR. Hsiungs remarks- » Dr. Bob

Posted by Lou Pilder on April 4, 2005, at 7:29:11

In reply to Re: being told to believe something, posted by Dr. Bob on March 30, 2005, at 5:22:35

Dr. Hsiung,
You wrote in this thread which has to do in some way with why you will not allow me to post the post in question, [...i'm afraid if people post... God telling them to believe things, then others might think that it applies to them, too?...].
There is a section by you in your FAQ that addresses as to who to believe, which could easily be interpreted that there are differnt points of view expressed here and that expressing different points of view is encouraged.. The FAQ also writes that [...different points of view are encouraged here...] and also writes something like that you do not endorse what others write, only what you write.
The post of the {quoting} of the song,[...{nothing but} the blood of Jesus will wash away my sins...] is the foundation of popular Christianity for the poster also has the quote on the link to the song,[...{without} the shedding of blood, there is {no} remission of sins...]. That is the pont of view of most popular christiandom denominations.
Could not others think that [...{only} the blood of Jesus will wash away sins ...] when they read the quote of the song, mean that it could apply to them in as much as you write that you have a fear that others will think what I propose to write will in some way cause them to think that it applies to them even though others here write that [...nothing but the blood of Jesus...] is to (him) like my proposed quote applies to me?
As far as your {fear} goes, are you saying that you will allow the Christian perspective to be posted here in a quote of a song without you haveing a fear of others thinking that it applies to them, and that you will restrain the Jewish perspective, and others that have the same perspective, in my proposed post, in a quote of a spiritual experiance, so that your fear is that others could think that the Jewish perspective could apply to them?
Lou

 

Lou's response to Dr. Hsiung's remarks » Dr. Bob

Posted by Lou Pilder on April 4, 2005, at 8:01:20

In reply to Re: being told to believe something, posted by Dr. Bob on March 30, 2005, at 23:00:24

Dr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...it is {not necessary} to say things like..the Rider say...].
Necessary for what?
Lou

 

Re: Lou's response

Posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 9:06:27

In reply to Lou's response to Dr. Hsiung's remarks » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on April 4, 2005, at 8:01:20

> are you saying ... that you will restrain the Jewish perspective, and others that have the same perspective

No, that's not what I'm saying. I apologize for not being more sensitive before. But some ways of expressing some aspects of some beliefs don't conform to the guidelines here:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7889.html

Sorry, but I'm not yet convinced that those guidelines should be changed...

> > > he could stop right there and whatever proseletyzing message he wanted to make would be totally evident
> >
> > I think her point was that what's currently allowed is enough and that it's not necessary to say things like:
> >
> > > "The tenets of my faith (or the Rider) say that those of my faith should xxx".
>
> Necessary for what?

Necessary for getting a message across?

Bob

 

Re: Lou's response

Posted by Lou Pilder on April 5, 2005, at 9:42:19

In reply to Re: Lou's response, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 9:06:27

> > are you saying ... that you will restrain the Jewish perspective, and others that have the same perspective
>
> No, that's not what I'm saying. I apologize for not being more sensitive before. But some ways of expressing some aspects of some beliefs don't conform to the guidelines here:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7889.html
>
> Sorry, but I'm not yet convinced that those guidelines should be changed...
>
> > > > he could stop right there and whatever proseletyzing message he wanted to make would be totally evident
> > >
> > > I think her point was that what's currently allowed is enough and that it's not necessary to say things like:
> > >
> > > > "The tenets of my faith (or the Rider) say that those of my faith should xxx".
> >
> > Necessary for what?
>
> Necessary for getting a message across?
>
> Bob
Dr. Hsiung,
You wrote,{...its not necessary to write ...].
I asked you [...necessary for what?...]
You replied,[...necessary for getting {a} message across..].
I have not posted my total message here to the community, for there is much more in my experiance to post, and if you already know what the message is that I want to get across, could you post what you think my message is? If you could , then I could have the opportunity to reply accordingly.
Lou Pilder

 

Re: How about if » Dr. Bob

Posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 12:19:20

In reply to Re: Lou's response, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 9:06:27

How about if Lou gmails what he wants to say to someone to check against the rules before he posts it?

 

Re: How about if » AuntieMel

Posted by 10derHeart on April 5, 2005, at 16:32:34

In reply to Re: How about if » Dr. Bob, posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 12:19:20

That's a novel idea.

I like it.

Have anyone in mind who would/could review it?

 

Re: How about if » AuntieMel

Posted by alexandra_k on April 5, 2005, at 18:20:24

In reply to Re: How about if » Dr. Bob, posted by AuntieMel on April 5, 2005, at 12:19:20

Might have to be Dr Bob's call on that one.

Good idea AuntieMel :-)

 

Re: Lou

Posted by sunny10 on April 6, 2005, at 14:58:36

In reply to Re: Lou's response, posted by Lou Pilder on April 5, 2005, at 9:42:19

Lou,

I have to say that I am quite impressed with your attention to detail and willingness to bend- to the degree that you used the word "experiance" with that particular spelling to validate someone else's idea.

That you can stand tall and also give credit where it is due is a true credit to you.

I'm not sure it helps, but I have been known to go over to Writing to write about my own life experiances... Some may believe me, some may not, but my tales get told; sometimes people actually take pieces of my writings and see if they can "use" them for their own benefit. Am I correct in assuming that you'd like your experiances to have maybe the same sort of audience? (although in my case, it's more like a "DON'T do what I DO" kind of thing!) Also, someone mentioned that you liked the Faith board because you know people over there and may be more inclined to write there. I'm sure that if you posted to Faith telling people that you've just written another installment in your tale, they would go over to read it.

Even if you've no practical use for my suggestions, you have encouraged me to sit a little taller in my chair today, and I thank you for that.

-sunny10

 

Lou's reply to sunny 10 » sunny10

Posted by Lou Pilder on April 6, 2005, at 16:11:24

In reply to Re: Lou, posted by sunny10 on April 6, 2005, at 14:58:36

sunny 10 You wrote,[...I thank you...]
Reading your post to me is refreshing to find here. It is not very often that one thanks me here.
Lou

 

Lou's reply to sunny 10 » sunny10

Posted by Lou Pilder on April 6, 2005, at 16:31:24

In reply to Re: Lou, posted by sunny10 on April 6, 2005, at 14:58:36

sunny 10,
You wrote,[...you have encouraged me to sit a little taller...today...].
Could you elaborate on that?
Lou


Go forward in thread:


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.