Posted by Lou Pilder on April 5, 2005, at 9:42:19
In reply to Re: Lou's response, posted by Dr. Bob on April 5, 2005, at 9:06:27
> > are you saying ... that you will restrain the Jewish perspective, and others that have the same perspective
>
> No, that's not what I'm saying. I apologize for not being more sensitive before. But some ways of expressing some aspects of some beliefs don't conform to the guidelines here:
>
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20020918/msgs/7889.html
>
> Sorry, but I'm not yet convinced that those guidelines should be changed...
>
> > > > he could stop right there and whatever proseletyzing message he wanted to make would be totally evident
> > >
> > > I think her point was that what's currently allowed is enough and that it's not necessary to say things like:
> > >
> > > > "The tenets of my faith (or the Rider) say that those of my faith should xxx".
> >
> > Necessary for what?
>
> Necessary for getting a message across?
>
> Bob
Dr. Hsiung,
You wrote,{...its not necessary to write ...].
I asked you [...necessary for what?...]
You replied,[...necessary for getting {a} message across..].
I have not posted my total message here to the community, for there is much more in my experiance to post, and if you already know what the message is that I want to get across, could you post what you think my message is? If you could , then I could have the opportunity to reply accordingly.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:476237
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050323/msgs/480123.html