Posted by alexandra_k on April 16, 2022, at 13:14:06
In reply to it manifests in their persistence, posted by alexandra_k on April 16, 2022, at 12:06:38
the nz government used to say that we didn't need to sign up for the un declaration on the rights of indigenous people because we had a treaty.
and then that we didn't need to ratify the rights of indigenous people because we had a treaty.
so i guess the maaori gave up their human rights (of themselves and their children and childrens children etc) when some of them signed the treaty.
that's the nz government's idea.
and australia doesn't need to honor it's constitution (whereby nz is a state of australia which, i would think, would mean that new zealanders would be entitlted to the rights and duties of citizenship -- including voting. and access to social services like the australian funded medications and the australian supreme court) because nz has a treaty.
is the australian and nz government's idea.
so the nz government is starved, rather, that it doesn't get access to federal funding. on the other hand it has a very very very bloated public service where ashley bloomfield earns more than fauci (i guess ashley was a better person for hte job or may fauci didn't have his application acknowledged as received).
but ashley bloomfield is gone, now, after having motivated and inspired a generation to study medicine so as to appear on tv for an hour everyday...
i wonder if he is related to angela... bloomfield. wasn't it?
time to focus on una jagose and david parker and the legal people who think the job of the courts and crown law is to punish anybody who points out that the nz government is not upholding either international law or domestic statute or local by-law.
it really isn't doing any of the things it's supposed to do, at all.
____
so, recently, one of the labor politicians called out that the labor party wasn't following their procedural documents on nomination of candidates.
they chose to break the rules in order to get someone else nominated.
a bit like how the national party, before the last election, did something funny with tehir nomination practices for auckland central. not putting something to a vote when it should have been or similar. to stabotage the electorate. insofar as i could see.. that was the effect. to create a one horse race tehre really isn't a viable alternative to chloe swarbrick. who was going to be the next nikki kaye for auckland central.
___
so, the parties are corrupt when it comes to their selection of candidates. no surprises, there.
why would you think there was anything less corrupt in how they go about nominating or appointing judges?
?
i mean... recently they hauled a couple judges out of retirement... apparently there was a rule that they retire at a certain age... they never bothered to uphold the incapacity issue. they had an age of retirement.
but, you know... when young kids are dying for no apparentlyy good reason in the university residential halls and when someone is filing about the university refusing to enrol, refusing to get work to external examiners, refusing to examine for the correct degree, refusing to allow qualification completion...
then you have to get the big guns with nothing to lose out of retirement to write judgments absolving the government of any wrong-doing.
___
i mean you couldn't possibly go 'alright.. these things aren't acceptable. how can we ensure that they don't happen again"
?But they want them to happen again.
over and over and over.
they are only interested in protecting tehir ability to murder or bully into suicide.
to keep studnets paying the university and slaving as slaves.
and so on.
they demonstrate that to the world.
nobody needs to prove anything.
their actions demonstrate.
even if they murder me tomorrow the proof is still apparent in everything they have done so far and in their complete and utter refusal to put things right.
where is my degree?
wehre is my place in medical school?
poster:alexandra_k
thread:1119370
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20220213/msgs/1119375.html