Posted by alexandra_k on April 14, 2022, at 14:56:15
so the government spent around $300,000 taxpayers dollars to advertise, overseas, for nzl trained nurses to work in nzl as icu specialists.
because, you know, we cry that the reason why we don't have developed-nation levels of icu specialists is because they are poached by other nations.
we can't match the salaries that overseas countries offer our icu nurses. because once we are done paying ashley bloomfield more than fauci etc there isn't any money left.
so they get quite a few applicants. hundreds. then they hire 3.
they probably hire the 3 they feel are most likely to be bullied, by them, into quitting. i would imagine.
who knows how many applications they really got. i know how they operate. they throw away applications for their own purposes. to make sure that various people with capacity are eliminated outright. so they can increase the odds or the chances of people who they fear would never be selected if they had all the applications from all the applicants before them.
so the government then says that the problem is that they don't have enough icu beds to actually hire them and put them to work.
but recently the government said that we had higher numbers of icu beds because we redefined icu bed into a bed that is staffed by a non-icu specialist.
i think they were pulling people out of administration, or something, and putting them to work as icu specialists. not paying them to work as icu specialists. but passing them off as.
probably people who sit behind a desk.
i remember reading something in USMLE step 1 books about how you can't make a clinical decision about a patient without seeing and examining the patient yourself.
so, for example, you can't perform a surgery without checking for yourself that the procedure is clinically warranted and the patient is consenting etc first.
and so on.
but i think they did away with that exam and maybe therefore those books. that information.
it's not right for our sociocultural environment in nzl where we don't pay workers because we want people to not be paid and unlawfully detained in the government institutions of nzl: otherwise they get no money, then, unless they turn to prostitution or crime. that's the aspirational goals of our leaders.
to pay the judges who refuse to uphold the law... to pay ashley bloomfield... to throw away applications in order to ensure that people who have applciations that appear less merioutous get the job... to refuse to pay the workers.
corruption.
they insist on documenting their corruption only.
read the judgments for yourself. una jagose thought the appropriate thing for the crown law to do was to haul certain particular judges out of retirement especially to ensure that teh whole closing ranks around protecting the government (including ignoring and destroying evidence) was done.
the university of otago refuses to supply applications to enrol to people who want to enrol in health science professional programmes. it discriminates against people, actively, being blatant about removing anybody's application if they have experience of how the health system is staffed (ideally) by Dr Leeks 2.0, 3,0, 4,0... and Dr Green 2.0... 3.0...4.0...
And the judge says that they have operational freedom to do that.
They have operational freedom to do anything anything anything they like quite above any accountability to the education act to uphold academic or intellectual freedom.
Just so you know... If you thought you were interested in laundering a bunch of money into the University of Otago of NZL. that we don't have hospitals. that we won't pay the workers etc.
They want to enrol those who will pay most to the unviersity but they are bargaining in bad faith. they don't have any intention of paying any of the workers at all.
There's ntohing here.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:1119343
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20220213/msgs/1119343.html