Posted by alexandra_k on November 21, 2021, at 14:18:47
In reply to Re: false positives, posted by alexandra_k on November 10, 2021, at 12:08:40
the minister of covid response (formerly the minister of state services commission (how much CE's get paid); health; and education) gets to decide who gets a 'medical exemption' from vaccination.
or, perhaps the ministry decides. and then informs the minister. then he tells the people roughly how many people will qualify for medical exemption -- they don't even need to see a clinician. people's medical doctors aren't making clinical decisions about whether the person who saw them needs a medical exemption or not. that decision has been decided on non-clinical grounds by people who have never seen the person and likely also by people with no medical training or qualifications.
the grounds for medical exemption are very very restrictive.
we don't believe in psychiatry. we don't have psychiatry. we have a social control thing only. like the rest of medicine, to be fair to psychiatry.
people don't get to say 'i do not want the vaccine' and thereby qualify for a medical exemption in the name of 'i do not give my consent, even after hearing information about it, i do not give my consent'. how distressing is it for someone to be involuntarily forced to do something they don't want to do in the name of government mandate? is that distressing? is that trauma inducing? psychologically damaging? how does it feel to be bullied by the government into complying with 'medical directive' like cattle or like sheep?
we can't all do whatever we want whenever we want because we want. we can't all be the minister. etc.
there's just a basic... i don't know if it's an incapacity or... i think it is. a refusal to even aspire to be a leader of people. the whole strategy for forced compliance...
in the exclusion zone of new zealand.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:1117418
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20210821/msgs/1117520.html