Posted by alexandra_k on February 2, 2005, at 4:14:50
In reply to Re: :-) » Angel Girl, posted by Dinah on February 2, 2005, at 4:00:17
We wouldn't want it to be seen that Dr Bob was promoting or endorsing or condoning Dr John bashing over here...
Hmm.
I have posted similar things on both sites. Not because I want to compare responses with respect to *better* or *worse* but because more responses can be more helpful. If you really have a question and want to hear a variety of opinions on that then it makes sense to widen your audience.
I have also complained about something I didn't like over there over here. Because I am used to bringing stuff I don't like here. I came here because I didn't know what to do. Ok so at first I was *horrified* because I thought that was ok on that site (not knowing the rules). But then once I had calmed down I figured that it most probably was not and figured that the appropriate thing to do was to tell a moderator. I went to do that and found PM's from people telling me exactly that.
I felt bad for having jumped to conclusions.
I didn't get a response but the thing was edited out along with a message saying 'do not open downloads or attachments if triggered by SI'.
I wasn't terribly happy with that. Was left wondering whether it is ok to do that and whether it was my problem for opening the attachment...
... all that being said Dr Bob can be frustratingly ambiguous at times too.
Nobody is perfect.
I didn't know that PM's were how admin type issues were dealt with. Thanks for that.
I wonder if I was one of the PC bashers :-(
That was never my intention...
poster:alexandra_k
thread:451208
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20050202/msgs/451580.html