Re: Some definitions » pegasus

Posted by sigismund on October 8, 2010, at 18:54:08

In reply to Some definitions, posted by pegasus on October 8, 2010, at 12:38:04

I don't know if I'm missing the point, but there is nothing invalid about transference.
I see it as describing the origins (and the style?) of the attachment.
Let's say you are in therapy, freely exploring the moment.....I guess that could be attachment without transference?

Thread

Attachment vs. transference pegasus 10/8/10
Some definitions pegasus 10/8/10
Re: Some definitions » pegasus sigismund 10/8/10
Re: Some definitions emmanuel98 10/8/10
Re: Attachment vs. transference » pegasus twinleaf 10/9/10
Re: Some definitions Dinah 10/9/10
Re: Some definitions Dinah 10/9/10
Re: Some definitions » sigismund pegasus 10/11/10
Re: Some definitions » emmanuel98 pegasus 10/11/10
Re: Attachment vs. transference » twinleaf pegasus 10/11/10
Re: Some definitions » Dinah pegasus 10/11/10
Re: Some definitions emmanuel98 10/11/10
Re: Some definitions Dinah 10/12/10
Re: Some definitions » emmanuel98 pegasus 10/12/10
Re: Attachment vs. transference » pegasus lucielu2 10/12/10
...
Re: more from my T about transference (long) » pegasus lucielu2 10/25/10

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:sigismund thread:965065
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20100831/msgs/965115.html

	for
in