Posted by DAisym on May 29, 2007, at 19:35:27
In reply to Re: here you go... the ethics thread, posted by Honore on May 29, 2007, at 17:23:30
>>>There's always been this idea in classical analysis-- at least in the modern American version of it-- that if you are too gratifying-- whatever that means-- that it induces or fosters dependence-- which could mean that the patient doesnt' confront and work through certain conflicts, but is able to avoid them through fantasies that the T can magically make things better, or fulfill the patient's needs. Then the patient doesn't have to deal with limitations, non-fulfillment of unrealistic dreams and beliefs, or losses-- etc.
<<<My first thought on reading this was, "does anyone really believe that anymore?" But of course they do. I think I am beginning to understand that many of these ideas grew from those treating truly "mentally ill" people - people who might have no judgement or were psychotic or delusional or had some other major pathology going on.
When I think of people who are depressed, or traumatized, some of these "techniques" feel cruel. But I guess that is why ultimately a good therapist understands what his clients need and what he (or she) is capable of giving. Boundaries that are a moving target are, imo, worse than too rigid or too soft.
Great discussion guys!
poster:DAisym
thread:759943
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20070525/msgs/760250.html