Posted by tealady on March 24, 2005, at 16:17:55
In reply to Re: omega-6 fat intake massively correlated to violenc, posted by Mistermindmasta on March 23, 2005, at 23:18:42
Personally, I think different diets affecting us depression/anxiety-wise is probably correct.
I also agree that "Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine if reducing high intakes of seed oils with alternative compositions can reduce the risk of violent behaviors."..it's just that what is written in the abstract doesn't seem to make much sense to me and doesn't really hold as far as proving anything.
You could take a comparison between "(Australia 1962) and (US 1990s)" as far as "higher rates of homicide mortality over a 20-fold range" and perhaps
cost of petrol (gasoline) ..
or price of land with ocean frontage..
or even security checks at airports.. (anything that has risen astronomically)> BTW guys it's best to arrive at an airpoirt like Heathrow calm and not shaking :-)
and probably come up with similar correlations.
You can't then imply that the increase in say security checks at airports cause a higher homicide mortality (I typed morality first :-)anyway that's the point I was trying to make . To be fair , the actual article might be clearer.
Jan
poster:tealady
thread:474544
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20050323/msgs/475073.html