Posted by Lou Pilder on April 1, 2015, at 5:22:45
In reply to Lou's reply-the intent » SLS, posted by Lou Pilder on March 31, 2015, at 17:00:42
> > > > > Hi, Lou.
> > > > >
> > > > > > The request by me to Robert was out of character to the mission of this forum
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the mission of this forum?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott,
> > > > You asked as to what the mission of this forum is.
> > > > The mission of this forum could be deduced by different readers as to what their knowledge is concerning what can be seen here. I am prevented from posting what I see as the mission here due to the prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung. Those prohibitions prevent me from showing the history and development of psychiatric drugs and the relationship of psychiatry and mass-murder and support. They also prevent me from posting from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, which if I was not prohibited by Mr. Hsiung to post such, it would be plainly visible what the mission of this forum is from my perspective.
> > > > Lou
> > >
> > > Scott,
> > > Now that you know that there are prohibitions posted to me here by Mr. Hsiung that prevent me from posting from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me, then since the mission of the forum includes that prohibition to me, a distortion could occur here as to how one perceives the mission here because only certain perspectives can be seen here.
> >
> > I think I understand your trepidations and motivations to question the civility and sociological ramifications of allowing an ancient post in the Faith forum to remain intact and without comment by the moderator of this forum.
> >
> > Would you recognize antisemitism were it to appear in more recent posts? Are there any such posts?
> >
> > Out of curiosity, what is Dr. Bob's reasons for not excising the posts that you are concerned with?
> >
> >
> > - Scott
>
> Scott,
> You asked about Mr. Hsiung's reasons for allowing the anti-Semitic statements to stand to be seen as supportive.
> Mr. suing states that being supportive takes precedence and that if it is not civil to not post it and members are to be civil at all times. e further states tat if a statement stands, it is not against is rules.
> This brings up as to what a reasonable reader could think as to what Mr. Hsiung's intent is to allow anti-Semitism to be seen ere as supportive. Mr. Hsiung further states that he in his thinking is doing what will be good for this community as a whole, and further, that readers are to try to trust him at that because he uses fairness and the Golden Rule in his administration of this forum.
> Now let's go on...
> LouScott,
Now Mr. Hsiung goes on to say that he could leave uncivil statments un intervened and that his intent by doing that is that by him allowing the unsupportive statement to be seen as supportive, then it will in his thinking be good for the community as a whole. This could be thought by readers to mean that anti-Semitic statements un sanctioned will in Mr. Hsiung's thinking be good for the community as a whole. That type of thinking was used to advocate slavery. That type of thinking has been used to justify genocide. That type of thinking has been used to justify infanticide. That type of thinking has been used to justify segregation. That type of thinking is used here by Mr. Hsiung to justify in his own mind using discrimination in the un equal applying of his rules here in particular, but not limited to, statements that put down, accuse deride insult and disrespect Jews. And in his thinking that will be good for this community as a whole.
Now a psychiatrist could know that people could be exposed to the risk of injury here by him allowing what could arouse hatred toward the Jews to be posted here that could arouse anti-Semitic feelings and lead Jewish readers to feel put down and that their faith is being disrespected by not only Mr. Hsiung , but those in concert with him here and his deputies of record that allowed the antisemitic statements to be seen here as supportive. His recent attempts to change what has already been done here does not erase the harm that could have already been inflicted upon any recipients of the anti-Semitic hatred being allowed to be seen as being good for this community as a whole as Mr. Hsiung has in his thinking. In fact, there could be a subset of Jews that could be even more offended by him now saying that he could leave anti-Semitic statements to be seen as supportive here, and to be seen as civil here, {so that it would be good for his community as a whole}. It is not in any question to me what is Mr. Hsiung's intent by doing that, for he openly states that he is allowing insults to Judaism to be seen as supportive here so that his community will somehow be "good" by him doing so as some readers could think by him using the European fascist ideology of what they called the {common good} to persecute the Jews and allow the community to use the Jews as an outlet for their sadism including mass-murder.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1077800
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1077950.html