Posted by Lou Pilder on December 4, 2014, at 6:36:05
In reply to Lou's response-, posted by Lou Pilder on December 4, 2014, at 6:27:09
> > > Redirect from Social:
> > >
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20141012/msgs/1073668.html
> > >
> > > Posted by SLS on November 21, 2014, at 23:26:23
> > >
> > > In reply to Re: Looks like Babble has died » happyflower123, posted by Phillipa on November 18, 2014, at 9:58:11
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm usually the one who has posted this in the past and then others come out and seem to take offense. I so agree with you. Where did everyone go? Philllipa
> > >
> > > Perhaps they left to escape from the pathology of the Administration forum; a pathology that affects the entire website. That pathology might even dissuade potential members from joining the community. The behaviors and de facto posting policies of the owner / moderator are on trial. There will be no winners unless he comes to emulate the persona who founded Psycho-Babble 15 years ago or discovers some new incarnation of himself that works to enhance mental health.
> > >
> > > Who would want to register at a mental health website whose owner spends each day chatting about antisemitism and defending the legalities of his posting behaviors towards its members? Nostalgic reminiscing of a much earlier time persists because the current dynamics have no potential of producing such memories in the future.
> > >
> > > I remain here because I have no place else to go.
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> > >
> > Friends,
> > It is written here what could IMHO be misunderstood by different subsets of readers. This is because the poster uses words like {perhaps} and {might}and {who would want to} and {have no}, which have different ideas to different readers minds in the context of the post.
> > One aspect of the context of the post could be seen as revolving around my discussion with Mr. Hsiung concerning anti-Semitism being allowed to be seen as supportive where the statements are originally posted as in,[...Who would want to register at a mental health website whose owner spends each day chatting about anti-Semitism and defending the legalities of his posting behaviors towards its members?...].
> > Let us look at one of the defenses that Mr. Hsiung posts here to allow anti-Semitism to be seen as supportive here and that not only can it be seen as being supportive , but by leaving anti-Semitic statements unsanctioned, it will be good for this community as a whole.
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1070410.html
> > Now looking at the rationale posted here by Mr. Hsiung for leaving statements unsanctioned that could arouse anti-Semitic feelings, or put down or accuse Jews, or lead a Jew to feel that their faith is being put down, or stigmatize Jews, or use Jews as scapegoats, or allow defamation toward me to be seen as supportive where those statements are originally posted, that rationale states that in Mr. Hsiung's thinking, it will be good for this community as a whole for those statements to be seen as supportive where they are originally posted. That has been said before by others that allowed hatred toward the Jews to be promulgated in a community. That rationale has also been used to justify slavery and infanticide and genocide and segregation and discrimination. It is nothing new, but an old way to sway people to accept hatred toward the Jews to be acceptable on the grounds that sometime in the future , the community will be improved by allowing anti-Semitism to be seen as supportive. This is not seen at the moment, for the use of {will be} involves acceptance of what could happen in the future, so those that use this argument to allow hatred toward the Jews to be seen as supportive, also say to the members to {trust me}, and do get people to do so. They could even put their faith in that person saying to trust them and consider that person to be some type of salvation to them, as history records. But it is much more than that.
> > Lou
> >
> Friends,
> Now I would like for readers to actuate the following post and examine its contents. To see this post, go to the bottom of this page to the search box and type in:
> [ admin, 1041599 ]
> Click on the post that has the 1041599 in the colored strip URL, not in the subject line.
> Lou
>
Frinds,
When you actuate the requested post by me, in that post that comes up, there is an offered link at the beginning. The correction is that to see that post, go to the search box again and type in:
[ faith, 428781 ]
look for the 428781 in the colored strip URL, not the subject line
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1073935
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140902/msgs/1073946.html