Posted by Beckett on July 3, 2014, at 14:12:55
In reply to Lou's request-ehubuz » Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on July 3, 2014, at 9:48:54
> wrote,[...your ..way of running Babble can be harmful...].
> I am unsure as to what you are wanting readers to think by that. This is all because your *way* is not defined and your *harmful* don't have examples.
> If you could post answers to the following, then readers could know what the way is and wat the harm is.
> True or False:
> A. The harm is what could befall Jews as a result of antiemetic statements being allowed to be seen as civil here in the post where they are posted originally.
> B. The harm is the emotional /psychological harm from the infliction of emotional distress by allowing libel against you Lou, to stand un repudiated in the post where it is originally made.
> C. The harm is the humiliation that Jews and Islamic people and other non-Christians could have inflicted upon them by the fact that their faith is degraded by that the statement {No non-Christian will enter heaven} is allowed to be seen here un repudiated in the post where it is originally posted, by the fact that there is not a post linked to it by Mr. Hsiung or one of his deputies of record then to the post where it is originally made to state that the statement could lead those of other faiths to think that their faith is being degraded and that their faith is being allowed by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record to be put down.
> D. Readers could be harmed by the fact that Mr Hsiung says that he can allow members to defame another here by putting them down or accusing them, if in his thinking the community will benefit by allowing the defamation so that in his thinking, it will be good for this community as a whole to allow him to disregard his own rules.
> E. The way that the site is run, by Mr. Hsiung having a provision for notifications to be responded to members, but that he gives himself the option to respond to yours, Lou, or not, is discriminatory and could lead to harm inflicted upon you, Lou, as discrimination is an abuse of power.
> F. more of your choice
> Lou
>I'm not sure how this tangle of accusations started or how Dinah became a target of accusations. The issues of antisemitism on the board, and by extension, harm to members of the Jewish faith and race, is overrated as to be happening at babble. Likely people could use more information in order to appreciate the profundity of the Jewish faith, and their unique place in world history.
However, can you see how targeting (a military term) particular individuals such as Dinah can go against some of the tenets you may hold important? I hope you can find ways not to target individuals at babble. In the past Dinah has been a true supporter of your views. I read some of these exchanges on the faith board a year or two ago. We are often called to draw upon our faith in trying times to seek what is wise action. Could not a down regulation of conflict be seen as wise as people suffer and begin to post impulsively and not wisely, and as people begin to feel unjustly accused, they feel,that their only defense is to leave.
There has been a decided departure of posters, and not all of them are because of your threads nor the hostile or defensive reaction to them, but these threads have a strong influence in this IMO. They certainly vex the forum members. All this is to say to back off Dinah.
.
This will be my only exchange in these threads, and I will not discuss them again. With respect, Beckett.
poster:Beckett
thread:1067704
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1067863.html