Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Vulnerable People » Dr. Bob

Posted by doxogenic boy on March 5, 2014, at 8:49:04

In reply to Re: Vulnerable People, posted by Dr. Bob on March 5, 2014, at 1:19:18

> Hi, everyone,
> I do like the idea of having a safe place to go.

Thank you very much for your reply. I hope it is possible to find a solution that most users on Babble are satisfied with. It seems like the majority would like a stricter enforcement of the civility rules, and I think that would make Babble safer for vulnerable people.

> Maybe it would help after all to have a Refuge board with more moderation.

I think it is worth a try. If it works, what about making all Babble forums to Refuge boards?

> Some posters might appreciate a third-party solution while they work on a first-party solution. Maybe it would be easier for them to learn to fish if they weren't hungry.

Can you elaborate this? I haven't read all the threads here on Admin, so I may have missed a point.

> Also, as I mentioned before:

> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20140214/msgs/1061603.html

> I'm thinking about "blinders", a feature that would keep posters from even seeing the posts of other posters, also to help them feel safe.

I support this idea. But one can see what the unwanted poster says, if other users quote him/her, unless it also is possible to blind replies to the unwanted poster. Maybe it can be a choice whether to blind just the unwanted poster or to blind replies to the poster too?

> I don't want others to see me as unable to change, so I try to see others that way.

Thanks.

>Plus, the rule is just to be civil, not to be empathic.

Yes, but if a poster shows lack of empathy, it could me uncivil?

> My view is that it's OK to educate people about trolls in general, but uncivil to accuse particular posters of being trolls.

Thank you for this clarification. But can you see the arguments for warning other posters againts malicious trolls, to protect their mental health and that those who warn about this can have good intentions?

> On the one hand, the idea that posters who react to trolls shouldn't be treated like trolls is incorporated into the block length formula, since I take into account whether someone seems to be provoked.

That is great. I didn't know about this.

> OTOH, what if a "troll" were reacting to someone we're not aware of?

Even if we try to be fair, we can fail sometimes, but I don't think this will happen very often.

> The idea of not feeding trolls is not to respond the way they want, which would reinforce their behavior. One alternative way to respond is to ignore them. What about supporting them? I realize that isn't the routine recommendation. This isn't a routine site.

If trolls are sadists, such as Canadian researchers say in the sciencific journal "Personality and Individual Differences" in the study "Trolls just want to have fun" (I have now found the fulltext article on the Internet, and it shows on the link below), then it is very difficult to support trolls without being exploited. If one realize after a long time that one has been exploited in a long-term troll strategy, it can be very hurtful and make it more difficult to trust other people. And the mentally ill often have problems with trusting other people. Supporting trolls may worsen their problems.

http://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/trolls-just-want-to-have-fun.pdf

Two quotes from the link above:

"Online trolling is the practice of behaving in a deceptive, destructive, or disruptive manner in a social setting on the Internet with no apparent instrumental purpose."
[...]
"Also as expected, sadism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism scores were positively correlated with self-reported enjoyment of trolling, all rs >.37 (see Table 1), even when controlling for overall Internet use, all rs >.39"
End quote.

What do you think about the above-mentioned study, as a mental health professional?

- doxogenic


Earlier TRD/anxiety
300 mg tianeptine, 6 X 50 mg successfully since Oct 2009
20 mcg liothyronine
40 mg escitalopram
100 mg trimipramine
50 mg agomelatine
600 mg quetiapine


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:doxogenic boy thread:1061607
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1061878.html