Posted by Lou Pilder on June 16, 2013, at 15:22:14
In reply to continued- Lou's reply-potential harm-, posted by Lou Pilder on June 16, 2013, at 12:11:52
> > > > >>...there are years of outstanding requests/notifications from me to Mr Hsiung and his deputy now and his former deputies
> > > >
> > > > >>it is easy for others here to persuade you because you lack the facts that I could post. Yet today, I will have to wait for someone greater than me to have the power to force Mr Hsiung and his lackeys to respond to my years of outstanding requests/notifications.
> > > >
> > > > Force? Could you describe what you imagine that would look like, Lou? Is there some person or entity "greater than [you]" that can "force" the administrator of an online message board or others who volunteer[ed] to assist him to do or not do anything? I am eager to know more about this.
> > > > =======================================
> > > >
> > > > (Merriam-Webster)
> > > > Definition of LACKEY
> > > > 1a : footman 2, servant
> > > > b : someone who does menial tasks or runs errands for another
> > > > 2: a servile follower : toady
> > > >
> > > > Toady - one who flatters in the hope of gaining favors : sycophant
> > > >
> > > > Lol...you can't mean "toady." The last thing I ever did or can remember any deputy doing, was to flatter Dr. Bob or be a sycophant. What favors were to be gained? Borderline abuse, frustration, exasperation, disgust, bewilderment? Ahh...the rewards of deputy relations with disgruntled posters and Dr. Bob.
> > > >
> > > > Lou, could you clarify which meaning of lackey (including toady)you meant in your post? I may request an apology, but I'm unsure what you meant. I don't mind menial tasks or errands one bit - it is an honor to serve others. But servile follower or toady...seem to hold a different connotation.
> > > >
> > > > I have another question, Lou. In your HHHHH opinion, is a request/notification which is not replied to with the answer that you prefer, or are looking for, or that you think is correct, considered "outstanding?" I have been trying to figure out what you mean by "years of outstanding requests" for a long, long time.
> > > >
> > > > Take care, Lou.
> > > >
> > > > 10,
> > > Now let us look at some of your other questions to me here. one being,[...is a request/notification which is not replied to with the answer that you prefer, or are looking for, or that you think is correct, considered "outstanding"?...].
> > > The TOS here saye that either the statement in the notification will be addressed in the thread by Mr Hsiung or his deputies, OR there will be direct contact from the administration via email or such. If neither of those are done by the administration, the notification from me is outstanding.
> > > If there was a post by the administration in the thread where the statement is notified about, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly. I need that opportunity to head off potential harm that I think could come to, in particular but not limited to, the Jews if the statement in the notification could arouse anti-Semitic feelings and is left to stand. There are years of outstanding notifications/requests from me to Mr Hsiung and his deputies.
> > > It is accepted by Mr Hsiung that statements that are not supportive could have the potential to cause harm when read by readers. The harm could come after the post is left unsanctioned in the future, for readers could think that unsanctioned posts are civil and supportive. And if harm could come to the Jews by the fact that anti-Semitic statements are left to stand, and my notifications/requests are outstanding, then I think that it is my duty to continue to attempt here to have those statements addressed as per Mr Hsiung's own terms of service.
> > > Lou
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1017615.html
> > >
> > > 10,
> > Now let's use this background on your request for me to explain my statement that I can not force Mr Hsiung and his deputies to respond and that I will have to wait for one greater than me to force them to do so.
> > There is potential harm that could come to people that are targets of hate in posts here that the hate is allowed to stand. The flame that Mr Hsiung says he will not wait to quench with him acting to sanction posts of that nature, since he states that one match could cause a forest fire, and if not, the fire is still burning.
> > Let us look at this post. Here not only is Judaism insulted, but Islam as well and other faiths and other peoples.
> > To understand what is at issue here, there are two lists. The second list describes those faiths that are the worst. And looking at #5 in the second list, you can see what I am referring to.
> > To see this post, go to the search box at the bottom of the page and type in,[faith,378930]
> >
> > 10,
> Let us look now at two other posts and the outstanding requests from me to Mr Hsiung contained therin
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1044738.html
> > http//www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1002372.html
>
> correction:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/1002372.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1045255
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1045386.html