Posted by Lou Pilder on February 12, 2013, at 13:24:48
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-pstown » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on June 9, 2012, at 13:31:16
> > > A. What could be a reasonable time to expect that you will do one or the other?
> >
> > I'd say a couple days?
> >
> > > B. During that time, can the poster post to the person issuing the PDP?
> >
> > Since the request for the PDP won't be posted, the poster can post to the person while it's being considered, yes.
> >
> > > C. What can the poster issuing the PDP do if you do not do either in , let's say, 2 days?
> >
> > Please use the "notify administrators" button to notify us again.
> >
> > > C. Is the {notify the administraors}feature to be used for all members in relation to a PDP?
> >
> > Yes. Since notifications go to the deputies, please be civil if they involve them.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> It is my understanding that you agree that two days to respond to a member's request is reasonable. If you could post answers here to the following, then I could post my response to whatever you post here.
> A. Is taking more than two days to respond to a member's request to you then {unreasonable}?
> B. If you agree that waiting more than two days to respond to a member's request is unreasonable, and you do not respond in the reasonable time-frame, how could that be good for the community as a whole since you ask members to trust you in that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole?
> C. If it will be good for the community as a whole to not respond to a member's requests like mine that are outstanding here, and there is something in the requests that if not acted on by you that could cause a death or injury to someone reading here, would you be willing to allow me to be free from the prohibitiopns that you have directed to me here so that I could post my response because I think that if I was allowed to do so, lives could be saved, a life-ruining condition may be avoided, addiction may be avoided and the concept of {education} would include {academic freedom}?
> D. Could you post here your rationale for prohibiting me to post what could have been in the historical record involving the time period that you have made a prohibition to me to not post {anything} about that political party in those years?
> E. Why would that rationale, if you post one here, be good for the community as a whole?
> F. Would you be willing to post in all of the threads where I have an outstanding request to you something like:
> 1. There is a request to me here but I am not responding to it because if I do,(insert your rationale here).
> 2. There is a request to me here, so you can email me and I will give you my response, but I will not post it here.
> 3. There is a request to me here, and the deputy could post a response, but the deputy has not done so because (insert your reason, if there is one that you know, here).
> Lou PilderMr Hsiung,
In regards to your reminmder polic, the above.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:754209
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1037917.html