Posted by Lou PIlder on November 22, 2012, at 13:41:33
In reply to Lou's rerquest for clarification, posted by Lou pilder on September 4, 2004, at 7:58:49
> Dr. Hsiung,
> Could you clarify what allows the poster to wtrite without admonishment the statement:
> [...He,(god) says that {Jesus is the only way to Him.} No other way is given by God except through the salvation offered by Jesus...].
> If I was to know why you are allowing that post without admonishment when similar posts are admonished,, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly
> Lou Pilder
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040729/msgs/385777.htmlMr. Hsiung,
In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the above.
Now I consider the allowing of statements of the nature here to have the potential to arouse antisemitic feelings in particular when there is a rule that covers such statements. And more than that, I am under your prohibition to me that prevents me from posting the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me so that I can not post the response to the statement as I would need to defend Jewery and Islam and other faihs that the statement insults, for Judaism and Islam and other faiths teach theri children that they can reach God and have salvation by another way in their own faith. I do not see that the statement can be seen differently by Jews and others if the member places the preface{I Believe or my church members believe or my group teaches such etc.}. I would like to know if you consider the statement in question supportive here if a modification was made to the statement, although I do not see one. Is there one?
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:386298
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1031695.html