Posted by Lou Pilder on June 25, 2012, at 13:26:04
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-thekdiscytanscviht » Lou Pilder, posted by SLS on June 25, 2012, at 13:03:39
> > > > > > Mr. Hsiung and hie deputy,
> > > > > > In accordance with your reminder provision, there are three additional outstanding notifications from me.
> > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > >
> > > > > What would be the status of your notifications if they have already been read?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > - Scott
> > > >
> > > > Scott,
> > > > You wrote the above. I am unsure as to what you are wanting to mean.
> > > > Lou
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you feel that your notifications remain outstanding for as long as Dr. Bob does not respond to them writing?
> > >
> > >
> > > - Scott
> >
> > Scott,
> > The TOS states that a notification to the administration will be either addressed in the thread in question or the administration will respond to the notifier by email or b-mail directly.
>
> Would I find this in the FAQ? If not, then where?
>
> > If niether of those are done by the administration, I consider the notification to be outstanding.
>
> So, then, the definition of "outstanding" with regard to notifications is yours alone?
>
> > A reminder provision to the administration is also given by Mr. Hsiung and also a provision to keep reminding Mr. Hsiung as a procedure to follow here for a requester of a notification and such to receive an answer.
>
> Where do you find this stuff? I did not see this in the FAQ. Perhaps I didn't look closely enough.
>
> > These are the {internal} procedures of the administartion that I know of to have a notification/request acted upon by Mr. Hsiung or his deputy.
>
> I don't understand what you mean here. Do you know of administrative procedures that the rest of the community does not know of because the procedures are not specified in writing?
>
> > Now if there is a way for the administraion here to act upon them other than what is given in the TOS here, I am not aware of any.
>
> Can you please provide me with a link to the TOS? Thanks.
>
> I don't have any suggestions as to how you should address your concerns regarding antisemitism. It seems clear to me that Dr. Bob has already acted upon your petition by allowing the verbiage that you found disagreeable to remain in place.
>
> If Dr. Bob does read your notifications and decides not to post replies to them, is that a tacit denial of your petitions? I vaguely recall that this was the way things were to proceed, but I am not sure. I would like to review the TOS in order to see if this policy is described there.
>
>
> - ScottScott,
You wrote the above.
Now there is much more to this here , but for now:Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1019988
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1020188.html